SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/28/2011 2:47:27 PM
From: Ann Corrigan5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224708
 
UPDATE: The Weather Channel says the earthquake was caused by an unknown fault-line running under D.C. and through Virginia. It is now being called Obama's Fault. Some think it was the founding fathers rolling over in their graves! Obama will say it's really Bush's Fault. Breaking News: Seismologists have confirmed that it WAS an earthquake and NOT the 14.6 trillion dollar check bouncing on the East Coast



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/28/2011 2:53:24 PM
From: locogringo4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 
Perry calls SS "a monstrous lie".

Then you must agree. So do I kenny_troll.

BTW, where is the location of that lockbox that is securely holding those funds for our younger generations?

Are those funds being invested wisely, or are they just sitting there in cash, perhaps in Fort Knox, or someplace safe from the filthy grubby hands of the greedy politicians?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/28/2011 2:55:49 PM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224708
 
Poor guy......even after being SUPREME COMMANDANT OF HURRICANE SERVICES FOR THE EAST COAST AND MAYBE THE ENTIRE WORLD........

GALLUP: OBAMA DISAPPROVE HITS ALL-TIME HIGH...

gallup.com

Nobody seems to like him............



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/28/2011 3:04:04 PM
From: tonto1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224708
 
What specifically does he call a lie?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/28/2011 3:33:04 PM
From: Sidney Reilly3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 
The politicians who robbed SS during the surplus years should be tried for treason. SS is insolvent because the politicians spent the surplus as soon as it was collected. Then they want to correct that wrong by cutting benefits to baby boomers who paid for it!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/28/2011 4:38:06 PM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224708
 
kenny..."Perry calls SS "a monstrous lie"."....

Not again! Another politician is accused of sending lewd topless photos online (in the same pose as the others)
By Mike O'brien
27th August 2011
dailymail.co.uk

Another politician appears to have been caught posting lewd photos of himself online.
Puerto Rican senator Roberto Arango was reportedly pictured in exactly the same pose as New Jersey democrat Louis Magazzu, disgraced congressman Anthony Weiner and congressman Christopher Lee.

It's another topless cell phone shot into the mirror.
Lewd: The photo thought to be of Puerto Rican senator Roberto Arango. He has yet to confirm or deny
Mr Arango allegedly posted it to Grindr.com, described as the largest all male location-based mobile network tool for Android, iPhone, iPod touch, iPad and BlackBerry.
He reportedly posted another photo of him kneeling on the bed, taken from behind.
Mr Arango is president of the Partido Popular Democratico, the Popular Democratic Party.
Shamed: Puerto Rico's wapa.tv shows a picture of senator Roberto Arango wearing the same necklace as the man in the Grindr.com shot
Guanabee.com reports that Puerto Rican TV show Dando Candela aired the topless picture last Friday after downloading it from the popular gay cruising app.
When asked about the photo, Mr Arango neither confirmed or denied taking it.
He said he has been charting his weight loss and that this picture may very well be a part of that.
Careless: One of the infamous photos of Anthony Weiner
Mr Arango said: 'You know I've been losing weight. As I shed that weight, I've been taking pictures.
'I don't remember taking this particular picture, but I'm not going to say I didn't take it.
'I'd tell you if I remembered taking the picture but I don't.'
Shameless flirting: Former Congressman Christopher Lee adopts a manly pose in his online photo
The Puerto Rican media dug up old images of Roberto wearing that same necklace he's wearing on the topless photo.
Earlier this month Mr Magazzu, 53, admitted sending a lewd photo to a woman he said he had been corresponding with online for several years.
He claimed she requested the pictures but was working with an 'avowed political enemy' at the time and that he did not know.
In June Anthony Weiner admitted he had sent explicit photos and messages to at least six women.
Christopher Lee sensationally quit Congress at the start of the year after he was caught sending emails, including one with a semi-naked picture of himself, to a woman on Craigslist.




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/29/2011 8:00:33 AM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224708
 
ken...al has ordered new talking point...surprised you have not used it yet?

Gore: Warming skeptics are this generation's racists
dailycaller.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/29/2011 11:59:08 AM
From: chartseer1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224708
 


"There will be no recovery as long as muslim indonesian citizen brilliant barry soetoro is President ."
.

news.yahoo.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/29/2011 12:54:35 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 
Obama's Legacy: A Failed Recovery & Double-Dip Recession By John Mariotti | Forbes – Sun, Aug 28, 2011

news.yahoo.com

There will be no significant recovery in the United States of America while Barack Obama is President. The evidence is overwhelming: everything Obama has tried to fuel a recovery (with his Democratic allies in Congress) has failed. Statistics claiming jobs saved by the stimulus package were mostly fiction, and cost American taxpayers about $275,000 each. Nearly 2-1/2 million fewer Americans have jobs than before the stimulus.

Barack Obama has been President for 30 months—2-1/2 years. He spent the first year obsessed with passing Obamacare, a program that doesn’t create jobs, but might destroy a lot of them. He “bailed out” GM, but many believe that his interference didn’t save GM; it merely cost taxpayers an extra $15-20 billion, and stole from legitimate investors to buy off the UAW. His broken campaign promises are too numerous to list. At some point, his statute of limitations on blaming Bush runs out. The latest joke is that the White House is that named the location of East Coast earthquake near DC “Bush’s Fault.”



Obama himself said, “…that after three years, if the economy wasn’t fixed he should be a one-term president.”

Clearly the economic malaise started on George W. Bush’s watch. Its causes will be argued for decades, but most of them are traceable to irresponsible lending and excessive spending— both by government and the American people. The trouble that started before 2008 is directly traceable to actions (or inactions) of Bush and GOP allies in Congress. They spent America into the start of the current deficit during his eight years in the White House.

But that was then, and this is now. Since Obama took office the situation has gotten much, much worse. Obama has run up the deficit at more than twice the rate Bush did. During the first quarter of 2011, the US economy “barely grew” —at 0.4%—that was followed by second quarter’s “anemic growth” of 1%. This was during the period when the Obama recovery was supposed to be well underway. Employment data is unremittingly terrible: new jobless claims are stuck at 400,000+/- each month, with job creation well below what it takes just to absorb new workforce entrants. More Americans have been unemployed longer than ever in our history. And looking ahead, the news is not good.

This is Obama’s failed American recovery, and in the near future, Obama’s impending double-dip recession (thanks in no small part to his three consecutive years with Trillion-dollar in deficits that have inflated the national deficit to soaring heights—$14+ Trillion.) That legacy clearly belongs to President Barack Obama and with help from the Congress led by Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi during 2008-2010. Thanks to them, our country hasn’t even had a budget since Obama took office.







The latest Obama Blame Finger pointing focuses on the “Tea Party” as “extremists” who have a problem with astronomical deficits as far as the eye can see. (Pointing at Bush is getting a little old since he’s been out of office for 2-1/2 years). Obama needs a new scapegoat. The problem with the Tea Party is that it is like the child in the fairy tale, “The Emperors New Clothes.” The child is reviled for pointing out that the emperor is naked. Thus, the Tea Party is not wrong, just unwelcome.

Now Obama also wants to point the Blame Finger at the GOP House for the downgrade in the US debt rating by Standard and Poor’s. It seems that he believes that everyone else is to blame but him. That downgrade was predestined by the combination of irresponsible spending and Obama’s clueless attempts to throw money at a recovery to no avail. Spending $1.50 for every dollar of revenue, running trillion dollar annual deficits is reason enough for a downgrade in the US debt rating.

Face it folks: This is Obama’s failed recovery. And if (or when) it comes to pass, this “double-dip” recession (just around the corner) is his too.

Make no mistake, there IS plenty of blame to go around. About 75% of Americans are fed up with both Obama and Congress. The conservative and liberal factions of the House and Senate behaved badly in the recent debt ceiling negotiation. President Obama wanted to stay above the fray so he provided no leadership. He didn’t even know how to bring the opposing viewpoints together. He talked about bi-partisanship and consensus, but his actions disproved his words.

Until the president saw an impending disaster, he sat on the sidelines, afraid to do anything that might hinder his reelection campaign. Then, when his intervention didn’t help, and arguably hurt the progress, he grew impatient, petulant and angry.

John Boehner, however, did an admirable job trying to build a compromise deal on the debt ceiling, and get his own Caucus to support such a plan. Except, Obama was attacked by his liberal base for even considering the “grand bargain,” so he came in and dumped another “raise taxes more” demand on Boehner. I’d have walked out too, which Boehner was right to do.

But at least they were arguing about the right thing: how much to cut spending and how.

The Tea Party’s desire for fiscal responsibility is right, but it doesn’t mean that tax revenue can’t be increased. It can; how it’s done is what matters. The tax code desperately needs to be restructured. Simply digging in on old positions doesn’t help; it hurts. The goal is to “get the country working again,” and grow our way out of this mess.

The one phrase of President Obama’s that I agree with is “Country First.” But John Boehner was the one who tried his best to put “Country First.” If Obama truly chooses that as his 2012 campaign slogan, it will reek of hypocrisy.

If the members of Congress would put 1) country first, 2) constituents wishes next, and 3) personal agendas last, they might be able to work together to find a way out of this mess.

What happens in the Super-Committee of Twelve will be both revealing and predictive. Either America’s Congressional leaders will—or won’t—put "country first" and try to find common ground and reasonable compromises to lead America out of this mess.

Whatever happens, this failed recovery and impending recession belong to President Barack Obama. His condescending explanations of why “we Americans” don’t get it, how “this will take a long time,” this recovery, and his “class warfare” about “millionaires and billionaires” versus the “common folk” are all wearing thin.

This kind of rhetoric won’t solve America’s problems. It takes strong, informed, and experienced leadership to get through a mess like this one. We need a fixer, not a hypocritical speechmaker in the White House. Barack Obama is not that man. A wise man once told me, “The person who got you into a problem is seldom the one who will get you out of it.” That’s why there will be no recovery on Obama’s watch, but there could be a double-dip recession.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/29/2011 2:52:59 PM
From: chartseer2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224708
 
I googled obama blames yesterday and got 8,000,060,000 results in 0.09 seconds. Today I googled obama blames and when it opened there was no longer any total results or time it took. Do you think this could be because now there are now more results than google can possibly total?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/29/2011 5:36:52 PM
From: FJB5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224708
 
One in four Democrats wants to dump Obama

by Byron York Chief Political Correspondent

Follow on Twitter: @byronyork

campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com

A new poll by CNN and ORC International finds that 27 percent of Democrats would like to see their party nominate a candidate other than Barack Obama for president in 2012.

In response to the question, "Do you think the Democratic party should renominate Barack Obama as the party's candidate for president in 2012, or do you think the Democratic party should nominate a different candidate for president in 2012?" -- 72 percent said they wanted to see Obama renominated. But 27 percent, slightly more than one in every four, said they wanted to see Democrats nominate a different candidate. One percent had no opinion.

The poll was taken August 24-25. In a survey taken in early August, 28 percent of Democrats said they wanted a different candidate. Polls taken in July and before showed Obama in a stronger position, with no more than 22 percent saying they preferred a different candidate. The current poll is based on interviews with 463 Democrats and has a margin of error of 4.5 percent.

The new poll is another indication of Democratic unhappiness with the president, but it does not mean Obama will face a challenge in his party's primaries. Despite the complaints of a few liberals like Sen. Bernard Sanders, the odds of a Democrat opposing the president appear to be something less than zero. But the new poll is still a matter of concern to Democrats, because it is yet another indication that there is significant disillusionment with the president within his own party. Whether those disaffected Democrats will come around to supporting Obama next year is an open question -- and perhaps the most worrying of the president's re-election bid.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (111488)8/29/2011 9:10:23 PM
From: locogringo5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224708
 
kenny, did you see this?

Obama announces jobs plan after vacation.....................OOPS.........in 2010. HUH????

Flashback Obama in 2010: New Jobs Plan after Vacation

President Barack Obama, in an Aug. 29, 2010 interview with NBC’s Brian Williams, said he would propose a plan for jobs and economic growth when he returned from his summer vacation, the same claim he made after returning from his vacation this year.

cnsnews.com