Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (626287)	8/30/2011 12:26:24 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578161

"not that it would matter to tthose who patronize cheap border brothels for economic reasons" Also for QUALITY reasons, Brucie! The Mexican prostitute is a much higher cut of beef than the drug addicted, diseased American product.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (626287)	8/30/2011 4:06:08 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578161

>>> Gary Johnson also for legal prostitution .. I have a really difficult time seeing why prostitution should be illegal. If women choose to have sex for money and men choose to pay them, I just don't see where it is the government's business. While I don't think it is something we ought to encourage, I find it inconsistent to believe that government should be out of people's private lives in one area while being totally IN their lives in another. There are, of course, reasonable limitations that should be applied. But I have the same problem with criminalization of prostitution as I do with criminalization of marijuana. For that matter, if a man wants to have five wives and it is okay with with the wives I just can't see how it is any of the government's business.