Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Data Race (NASDAQ: RACE) NEWS! 2 voice/data/fax: ONE LINE! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Marshall who wrote (25728)	11/19/1997 12:37:00 PM
From: Jeffery E. Forrest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33268

Thanks for the "short" articles. Much appreciated. I can't seem to find that Barron's piece I was talking about. I also don't recall the title which doesn't help any. A large part of the article featured a stock picking service that used short interest as a means of either shorting a stock or staying away from it. Does that sound familiar? Not sure if it was the "Anatomy of Short Squeeze". In fact I thought that was the name of the article I read in thestreet.com? I read so much every day all day that I just can't keep track. Information overload.<G> I had this particular article saved.........SOMEWHERE.<GG> ****** while it may have worked in the past, trying to predict this thing with T/A lately has proved to be the downfall of more than one poor soul. TA is only as good as the interpreter. Just as some folks can look at a road map and STILL get lost, TA can also get you lost if you can't "read a map" As you know TA is not infallible either. If it were, we'd all be richer than Billy-boy Gates. It certainly increases the odds of success if you know how to use it properly though. ****** Barron's biased??? Nawwww. How could you think such a thing.<G>