Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (401)	9/1/2011 3:52:30 PM
From: longnshort	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

"There can be a problem with reading something with such unyielding, almost dogmatic, beliefs that the mind changes the words into something that never existed" Like Koan reading that Obama was Editor of the review when the article said President ?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (401)	9/2/2011 12:34:02 AM
From: Nadine Carroll	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Hm, let's try the shoe on the other foot: Suppose not one but several veteran career DOJ lawyers resigned their jobs, gave up their careers, during the Bush administration, and testified under oath that they did so because they were upset at the lawlessness of Attorney General Ashcroft, who had given them point-blank instructions to drop all civil rights cases and never start new ones. Would that have been a "crazy allegation", to be dismissed with contempt? Somehow I doubt it. Eric Holder's DOJ dismissed the case against the NBP after they had won the judgement. There can be a problem with reading something with such unyielding, almost dogmatic, beliefs that the mind changes the words into something that never existed. Yes, there can. Did you even read the articles I linked? That was the Washington Post, not a right-wing media outlet.