Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (605)	9/2/2011 8:19:28 PM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (605)	9/2/2011 9:50:45 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 85487

"Mann's mishandling of data was proved early on when he refused to release his raw data " Not in the least. Were you a scientist, you would know that MM's request was pretty unprecendented. Real scientists go out and collect their own data, and write their own codes. You would know that, if you had ever written a paper. Only the usual suspects consider Mann to be suspect, and those folks either haven't gone beyond third grade science, or they dropped out of college after 7 years, or they flunked organic chemistry and then run for president. meteo.psu.edu "That's not how you do science." Since you do not now, and never have before, done science, you haven't a clue about how to do it.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (605)	9/3/2011 10:00:09 AM
From: Alastair McIntosh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Mann finally did release his data. In a corrigendum published on 1 July 2004, Mann, Bradley and Hughes acknowledged that McIntyre and McKitrick had pointed out errors in proxy data that had been included as supplementary information to MBH98, and supplied a full corrected listing of the data. They included an archive of all the data used in MBH98, and expanded details of their methods. They stated that "None of these errors affect our previously published results." en.wikipedia.org