Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (706)	9/3/2011 1:31:01 PM
From: koan	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 85487

<<first, I don't believe the 50% of conservatives number to start with. I'd love to see the survey and how the question was asked. I'd also like to see the profile of the sample set. >> See links below: Majority of Republcians doubt evolution. Gallup poll: gallup.com But not believing in the theory of evolution as described by Darwin is not the same as not believing in <<"evolution". There are many theories of evolution. You can believe in one and not believe in another. One theory is of natural selection of small variations of traits that are then passed on to subsequent generations. The variations that allow the organism to compete better in the environment, give those organisms that have that trait a better chance to pass it along to the next generation allowing for gradual changes in the species. Not everyone believes this!! and they still believe in evolution.>> Evolution is evolution is evolution. All they are arguing about are the details. What is remarkable is how good a job Darwin did in 1859. Sure there are lots of details to figure out. But not the basic theory. And how the eye evolved and much more is not a big mystery-lol. <<Another is that major mutations happen due to either by chance or by environmental forcing. The belief is that the evolution is not gradual at all but happens in fits and starts. >> Sure, it is probably both. In fact, lamarkian evolution is starting to come back into vogue as another avenue. But it is still evolution! <<Some people believe that it is likely a combination of evolutionary forces.>> Everyone believes that. <<Another is that God breathed the spark of life into the first organisms and started and planned the process that has brought us to where we are today. Others believe that God started the process and has let chance bring us to where we are today (through unplanned evolution). >> Who created god? Few scientists beieive that. That is just more rationalization. Sort of funny that people can believe in an infinite god, but not an infinite universe that evolved a god. The latter is more logical. <<Believing in God and that God created everything is not the same as not believing in the theory of evolution as defined by Darwin.>> I agree. <<As a side note, my son goes to a Catholic school. They teach evolution there. It was one of the things that I asked up front. It was also a requirement for me to send my son to the school.>> I avoided all conventional religious schools. I want my children taught by people not confused by religion.