SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (100851)9/5/2011 10:02:47 PM
From: zeta1961  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
He's an evil person who wants to sow even more discontent within in the D party. As if the bombs he's thrown at former colleagues wasn't enough excitement for his billion dollar heart---courtesy of you and me.

I believe that despite our arguing with Obama, we will come together for election day 2012.... no choice--the alternative is a disaster...



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (100851)9/5/2011 10:15:29 PM
From: cirrus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
A lot of Democrats are wondering exactly that. If Obama wants to re-energize the party he ought to switch Biden and Clinton.

it would be "interesting to speculate" about how she would have performed as president.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (100851)9/5/2011 10:36:59 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 149317
 
Mike Lofgren leaves ‘the cult’

Before this morning, I’d never heard of Mike Lofgren. But James Fallows explained that Lofgren recently retired from a lengthy career as an esteemed Capitol Hill staffer. Fallows characterized him as a respected, knowledgeable figure.

And with this in mind, it was rather striking to read the lengthy piece Lofgren wrote for Truth Out, published yesterday with this headline: “Goodbye to All That: Reflections of a GOP Operative Who Left the Cult.”

To be sure, this Republican aide is not at all a fan of Democrats. But he also believes “nothing … quite matches the modern GOP.”

To those millions of Americans who have finally begun paying attention to politics and watched with exasperation the tragicomedy of the debt ceiling extension, it may have come as a shock that the Republican Party is so full of lunatics…. The Congressional directory now reads like a casebook of lunacy. […] It should have been evident to clear-eyed observers that the Republican Party is becoming less and less like a traditional political party in a representative democracy and becoming more like an apocalyptic cult, or one of the intensely ideological authoritarian parties of 20th century Europe.

Let’s just note, again, that this isn’t the assessment of some wild-eyed lefty. The author is a long-time Republican aide, respected by those who’ve worked with him, who’s worked for nearly three decades with GOP policymakers.

And he’s convinced Republicans have succumbed to madness.

Also note Lofgren’s take on the contemporary Senate.

The only thing that can keep the Senate functioning is collegiality and good faith. During periods of political consensus, for instance, the World War II and early post-war eras, the Senate was a “high functioning” institution: filibusters were rare and the body was legislatively productive. Now, one can no more picture the current Senate producing the original Medicare Act than the old Supreme Soviet having legislated the Bill of Rights. Far from being a rarity, virtually every bill, every nominee for Senate confirmation and every routine procedural motion is now subject to a Republican filibuster. Under the circumstances, it is no wonder that Washington is gridlocked: legislating has now become war minus the shooting, something one could have observed 80 years ago in the Reichstag of the Weimar Republic. As Hannah Arendt observed, a disciplined minority of totalitarians can use the instruments of democratic government to undermine democracy itself. […]

A couple of years ago, a Republican committee staff director told me candidly (and proudly) what the method was to all this obstruction and disruption. Should Republicans succeed in obstructing the Senate from doing its job, it would further lower Congress’s generic favorability rating among the American people. By sabotaging the reputation of an institution of government, the party that is programmatically against government would come out the relative winner…. Undermining Americans’ belief in their own institutions of self-government remains a prime GOP electoral strategy [emphasis added]

Have I mentioned that Lofgren is a veteran Republican staffer who knows exactly what GOP policymakers are thinking because he’s worked with them closely every day for 28 years?

There is one great overwhelming dilemma that dominates American politics in this early part of the 21st century. It is not the extent to which President Obama has failed to meet the expectations of the progressive base, though this matters. It is not the lazy, negligent, and incompetent establishment media, though this matters, too. The issue that should dominate the landscape is the radicalization of the modern Republican Party and the effects of having one of two major political parties descend into madness.

For much of the American mainstream, there’s very likely an assumption that voters can choose between a center-left party and a center-right party, because this assumption was generally accurate for several generations. It’s past time for the mainstream to realize this is simply no longer true. Those who have any doubts should apparently talk to Mike Lofgren.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (100851)9/5/2011 10:38:48 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
Cheney isn't getting into specifics, but he does think that "perhaps she might have been easier for some of us who are critics of the president to work with."

From Cheney's perspective.....of course she would be easier.........she's white.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (100851)11/3/2011 6:07:10 PM
From: John Vosilla  Respond to of 149317
 
'Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton As President Would Have Made Different U.S. '

And a world without Dick Cheney spending even one day in the White House would have made us much safer, stronger, wealthier and less divided today. About the most evil person ever elected into public office in this country IMHO.. Everything we talk about today, all our problems can be tied to policies initiated in 2001-03