Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (1309)	9/7/2011 11:46:58 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

WE can't have scientists on the take from special interests on either side of the question, but I don't think you should be promoting the research of one (Soon) who is--nor will I promote the research of one who is. As special interests go, there is no special interest bigger or more successful in raising billions than the claim that climate change is man-caused and an imminent disaster. The AGW crowd claimed for years, falsely, that the only people who opposed them were paid off by Exxon. Any independent view of the money flows shows that not only have most of the big Energy companies thrown in with the global warmers, but that the money invested is hugely more on the side of the AGW crowd.