Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (79258)	9/8/2011 7:51:47 AM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 217865

<<The difference is that the US government isn't preventing them from exercising that voluntary choice>> ... hm, you cannot have it both ways, - on the one hand pointing to the fact that there are many china families setting up second homes and citizenships overseas as some ostensible desire to give up on china whereas they are just and only wisely hedging their bets as you should be, which you are apparently willing to learn the hard way, and - on the other hand stipulating that china is somehow preventing china folks from exiting even as more china families are able to set up hedges unimpeded whereas usa families face all manner of depravity such as explicit threats of not even able to visit still-in-usa families subsequent to de-camping usa, and indignities including exit tax and 10-years chase-back to give up china citizenship, one merely need to stop entering china on china passport to throw away usa citizenship, one needs to line up for exit interview compare and contrast however you could, but doubt you can make a case of china control over its citizens to give up china citizenship however you may try without being too comical in the try.