Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joefromspringfield who wrote (112375)	9/8/2011 9:56:23 PM
From: Paul V.	Respond to of 224729

Joe, I think Bush I, was the best qualified President that the US ever had. He was a businessman, served in the service as a pilot, VP, and CIA Director. The way he handled Sadem Hussein, and Iraq was correct. He appeared to realize that Sadem was the policeman in that part of the Far East holding Iran, Syria, Saudi, and other countries in check through fear. That is why Bush II statement which you posted, IMO, was purely foolish. OBama would never had gone into Iraq. But, would gone after the terrorist with the drones and special forces. This would have held down the expenses of costly wars. However, that is just my conjecture.