Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : VLVT (was CSMA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steven Durrington who wrote (913)	11/18/1997 11:46:00 PM
From: oldcrow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11708

Durro, When I spoke with Mike Millis today I asked about the status of the permit, and he indicated that there was nothing in the works at this time that would indicate a no-go with the permit. Everything is still progressing as reported. C$MA is....... GOING $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ ALL $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ THE $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ WAY $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$!!!!!!!!!!! ps: is anyone REALLY able to sleep soundly at night with all this excitement? Allen

To: Steven Durrington who wrote (913)	11/19/1997 6:16:00 AM
From: Dick Jaffe	Respond to of 11708

Durro, I have enjoyed your enthusiastic posts. I think you should hop over to the NETZ thread for a look at another CSMA. Enjoy! Dick

To: Steven Durrington who wrote (913)	11/19/1997 8:47:00 AM
From: David Smith	Respond to of 11708

Steven: I received the same email. Apparently, this person is emailing CSMA investors and is challenging Neal's post. I called Neal last night, who is an engineer, and there is no doubt in my mind that Neal has the true story. WATCH FOR INDIVIDUALS TRYING TO SHAKE YOU OUT. They have their own agenda. Neal ? I got a private e-mail from someone overnight who questioned the well's upgrade based on geological considerations. I understand that the EPA has approved the upgrade (please correct me if I'm wrong here), and that it was going to the local authorities for final approval, which is considered almost a formality (correct me again if I'm mis-remembering previous posts). It has been pointed out that my statement concerning the pricing of Class V disposal is probably in error. The average price of $20 still holds true but I am going to find out the details of the price range that has been set for disposal, who sets it, and why there is a range. I will post once I receive this information. David Smith

To: Steven Durrington who wrote (913)	11/19/1997 9:07:00 AM
From: TraderGreg	Respond to of 11708

Durro-I absolutely agree with you that the 4th quarter IS the turnaround and forward looking, your analysis is quite reasonable. Plugging in different estimates will of course give different earnings but on balance we're in sync. TraderGreg

To: Steven Durrington who wrote (913)	11/19/1997 11:55:00 PM
From: Neal Bernard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11708

TO ALL: Class V Injection Well Clarification I under stand that there has been some information disseminating out to various people who post on this thread about the viability of this facility to function as a Class V facility. Lets all remember one thing, that this is a working facility that is currently permitted for Class II operation. Class II operation provides disposal for oil byproducts from the extraction process. Class V is less stringent. My conversation with the Environmental Scientist directly over seeing the permitting process at the Utah Division of Water Quality has not even reviewed all the data to formulate a quantitative decision. This Friday is a meeting for questions and answers and a review of the hydraulic calculations Provided by Enviro-Tech and the Scientists they contracted. These calculations are being review for all geological considerations. And the primary consideration is upward mitigation to the upper aquifer, which is standard procedure for any deep well process. (Remember, currently working). The economics of this are simple as stated from the EPA director region 8 (west coast): " Cesspool wells (shallow wells) which receive untreated sanitary waste and allow the waste to percolate directly into the subsurface. EPA believes cesspools have a high potential to contaminate the aquifer. Based on these concerns, new cesspools are currently banned in all States. Where State bans presently exist, States are phasing out existing cesspools over a time." Now we have a deep well with DEMAND, how simple does it get!! Drive the "chicken fat" to us, and we will inject it for you!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am not an expert on this process, I'm only a guy who asked a lot of questions to try and formulate a constructive view point of the project. What I post, is all in truth and from outside parties. Try not to be swayed from outside parties trying to postulate events of a meeting that has not happened. Just let it happen! Your ass is mine shorty, Invest long and stay cool, Neal