SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: joefromspringfield who wrote (112574)9/10/2011 9:45:41 PM
From: Paul V.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224744
 
Joe, I like the tea party approach better. Don't negotiate with them. Band together, get a candidate that represents your views and work to defeat those in power causing the problems you perceive.



Whatever approach which is utilized it is still based on power or perception of potential power of the masses. However, some where along the process some negotiations has to take place. Otherwise, things get out of control and the organization crashes. I have seen entire organization crash because the parties did not resolve the dispute. Normally, there are techniques to resolve dispute: mediations, arbitrations, and/or courts of final jurisdiction. When these means fail all hell breaks lose. Corporations have the right to move to another country to lower their labor cost, increase the productivity of technology while displacing workers, reducing the wages, and terms and conditions of employment, or closing the business and/or making political contributions to buy their Congressman or Legislator.


Unions have the right to file EEOC,NLRB, EPA, discrimination charges, work for and make political contributions to buy their Congressman or Legislator. etc. When it carries on long enough and the pain becomes to great on employees then violence may occur depending on the mind set of individuals.



Like I have stated in prior post: "I believe, that we elect the best of the least Congressman or Legislator that money can buy - especially with contributions now considered as free speech with the latest Supreme Courts decision."