Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Blue Chip Gold Stocks HM, NEM, ASA, ABX, PDG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gold$10k who wrote (31227)	9/11/2011 5:18:13 AM
From: TheSlowLane	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 48092

Can I sample and re-mix that? <g> If it is not obvious to you that gold will inevitably reach at least $5000 in the next 5 years, then you should keep studying until it is. And then buy the (*#$% out of the PMs. With both hands.

To: gold$10k who wrote (31227)	2/15/2013 9:29:18 AM
From: Zincman	5 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 48092

OT: Funny, the more talk gold going even higher, the more it continues to fall. Two years ago at 1900, there were countless calls for $2-3-10K gold too. It just had to go up. It was "obvious" to me it was going lower and many ridiculed that call. And continue to do so to this day. Gold does not have to do anything... To suggest otherwise is a guess. At 1900, those that guessed gold was going higher, have been wrong for two years now... and remain so to this day. Character attacks on those that have not invested in gold are are not necessary. Just b/c ones opinion differs from another does not make either person right. To each his/her own. To give investment advice, ad hoc, is laughable. How can anyone know what is best for other investors given the minuscule info garnered from an SI website.. In fact, it's quite irresponsible.