Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CF Rebel who wrote (112610)	9/11/2011 10:23:15 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	8 Recommendations Respond to of 224747

Great post. What we have here is a liberal elitist who, as you said, is a broker. Someone who contributes nothing to the production of anything. Rather he destroys our ability to compete in the world market. The only thing worse than unions are community organizers. Both are cancers....parasites....viruses.

To: CF Rebel who wrote (112610)	9/11/2011 10:49:09 AM
From: Follies	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224747

Excellent post !! I like your idea of not buying a union made car. We need to carry that idea to all purchases, buy American , but buy right to work or union free products. If that takes off we can empower employers. Now that's a job creating idea.

To: CF Rebel who wrote (112610)	9/11/2011 10:58:14 AM
From: tonto	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224747

There serves little purpose recognizing Paul. His last post supporting criminal activity is ridiculous.

To: CF Rebel who wrote (112610)	9/11/2011 7:53:45 PM
From: Paul V.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224747

CF, See General Motors and Chrysler for instance. They should have been allowed to go bankrupt. Really? What would have happened to all the suppliers, their workers and those having financial dealings with these and other companies, let alone the economy? But, you are catching on: whatever side (public and private organizations or international) the issue is impacting, bargaining is based on the perception (real or imaginary) of POWER which each believes the other side has. The settlement is based on these perceptions. Mutual Deterrence, en.wikipedia.org is based on the the theory of perceived power. One side Camouflages and glorifies their actions as being the 100% right position while picturing the enemy as 100% wrong and evil. This is true of the other side as well. It is interesting the members of this site justify their perceptions and behavior glorifying their position while stating the organizing position is 100% evil. I just smile when such statements are made!! But, I understand why the poster takes such a position.