SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hippieslayer who wrote (11419)11/19/1997 1:24:00 AM
From: squetch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
FUGAZI, In an attempt to help you understand me. Please know the thread IMO has already done the question Henry thing once already. The thread also had another trying situation on it. When you agreed w/ Courtney in 11283 that she made valid points,I thought you hadn't read much of the thread. The thread was very disrupted as I stated by at least one person who asked Courtney's first question in a what appeared to me to be a malicious manner who IMO hadn't much of the thread. I guessed this b/c I don't know Henry personally but knew his background from reading the thread. (Also Courtney said she did her homework.) I don't care about the second question she asked! That was the first hot button you hit--appearing to me to not read much of the thread. This leads to who I was protecting in my next post to you.



To: Hippieslayer who wrote (11419)11/19/1997 1:47:00 AM
From: squetch  Respond to of 32384
 
FUGAZI, >>who are you protecting henry from? The likes of me.<<You missed the point of my post first of all. I believe individuals will and can decide for themsleves. If I was protecting anyone, I guess I was protecting myself from having to read this kinda s**t. (Guess I gotta work on that everyone-sorry) As I said we have already "attacked" Henry on this thread. So with that...

>>how in God's name did you come up with the idea that I'm trying to
protecting the helpless souls that lurk on this thread from henry<<First I do not desire to be saved. Second I got this from my view of the tone of your posts.

11388>>You like all of us have to show some accountability for what you type<< and >> It's in some of these posts below that you should have shown some restraint in what you dangled before us.<< and >>And since most on this thread seems to be complacent on this issue<<

11392>>it's ina ppropriate to throw out as Henry did especially how he did it by telling us this weekend or soon.<< and >>Should everyone now be able to post detailed info that no one can verify<< and >>What Henry believes is valid, w/out any means of verification in our instance, does not mean that he has to print info for other to read<<

And your last post to me>>But, I'm having a hard time persuading others that they have to have some accountability for what they write. And, it is you Sir-and other on this thread, that I believe are the rats following to the Henry's every tune. The problem is that there is a unified problem of tone deafness. If Henry misses a note or plays one out of tune, you guys completely miss it.<<Also could you please explain how I (and then others) are following Herny's every tune?

Some other issues you raise >>You take my remarks as if they were a personal attack on him.<< I take your remarks as either being naive or not taking responsibility for your actions. Questioning his background as lack of homework.

>>If so, then why the problem if I or anyone decides to write about it?<< I hope I have explained why the hairs on the back of my neck have been raised.

Now I'd gladly be surprised FUGAZI. How much of this thread have you read? When was the first time you purchased a LGND security? When was the last time? Regards squetch