Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TH who wrote (39885)	9/12/2011 11:25:09 PM
From: microhoogle!	Respond to of 119360

TH 8-10 trillion looks mind boggling indeed. Now I am slowly coming around to the idea, that is indeed what will end up happening over next decade - regardless who is in power.There will be lot of pain and gold is still cheap at current levels.

To: TH who wrote (39885)	9/12/2011 11:31:31 PM
From: Giordano Bruno	Respond to of 119360

Easy on the common sense fella. -g-

To: TH who wrote (39885)	9/13/2011 12:46:49 AM
From: koan	4 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 119360

I will not debate Krugman. I have my knowledge which I have checked against his for years. I have taken the time to read his stuff study his charts and read his books. I consider him to be in the intellectual company of Russell, Whitehead, Feynman, Newton, Hawking, Heisenberg and Keynes, etc. I have read those guys too. Ask yourself this question. Would the Republican congress in 1941 have appropriated a 4 trillion dollar (todays dollars) stimulus package without the war? Of course not. In fact they talked FDR into cutting spending in 1937, so they would never have appropriated 4 trillion-----not in a zillion years. Yet, we hear it every day: "WWII pulled us out of the depression. It did. So what do you think would happen if congress appropriated a 4 trillion infrastructure program? Krugman says he has crunched the numbers. Has anyone else? Krugman said from day one the stimulus was too small and wouldn't work. 40% was tax cuts and a lot of the rest was aid to the states. And for all the yelling about deficits the congress very cavalierly added a trillion dollars to the defiticit by extendingthe bush tax cuts for two years.