Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1903)	9/14/2011 3:45:32 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Appreciate your reasoning. 1. My argument for the first part is not that the bulk of pro-warming scientists disagree with Anti-Warming Scientists for political reasons, but that Brumar and Nadine SAY/ARGUE that politics, along with all the grant money, is the basis/reason for the Pro- Warming's Scientists disagreement (that's why I asked B&N to provide some facts to support that claim). Additionally, B&N argue the pro-global warming science is not that strong/credible. ( And I'm not saying anything one way or another about the science other than its this number of scientists saying this vs. that number of scientist saying that.) 2. Let me think about your second part for a while. You've got some good stuff in there. I certainly do agree it is your call to make on the basis of what you've read--even though I may have come to a different conclusion. Later, BUTW