SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (27552)11/19/1997 4:17:00 AM
From: Graystone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Paper
Is the reality of cyberspace. Its what is and isn't, it's about how you get there and what you see. Frankly, your presence is paper, it is who you are and where you are coming from. I am not doing anything here but synopsis, not making, but watching. Paper is the reality and it doesn't take much to determine if it is real, is this four dollar bill good ? Paper trails can look identical (have the same outline) and be different (have a different agenda) A demonstration is in order. Every time you see a reference * symbol, the corresponding link can be found below. You can go look.

Imagine : A letter to Mr E. Charters. The date is October 30th.

Mr. Charters

I am a subscriber to your newsletter <not, heheheh, mebbe I should be.> My broker recently called and mentioned he wanted to put some money into a stock called International Precious Metals Corporation, he said it was a Canadian company. A search of the internet turned up a website.* I went to one of the news services which I use regularily ISDNewswire. and searched for this "IPM" I saw a lot of news releases listed there, right company.** I decided I better look up the stock price on Canada Stockwatch so I did.*** I immediately saw that the chart was for a different company, so I went and looked up that one.****

It turns out that both are in the business of mining. Which one should I buy ? I realize that you provide this as a service but I thought you might want to reply to me here on SI. Any reply recieved would be appreciated, though superfluous.


* ref 1 disabled link, stops back htp://www.ipmcf.com/
see IPM beside " Precious Metals(IPM)" ...
* ref 1 enabled link, stops back ipmcf.com
see IPM beside " Precious Metals(IPM)" ...
** ref 2 isdnwire.com
choose the search on stock symbol and use "IPM"
*** ref 3 chart.canada-stockwatch.com
choose the chart option and use "IPM"
**** ref 4 cdn-news.com
choose the search on stock symbol and use "IPM"



To: E. Charters who wrote (27552)11/19/1997 6:08:00 AM
From: KVASIR  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
ok..author Bob Cunningham(director of marketing concepts for General Dynamics) to Francis Gabreski: "Colonel Gabreski, in Korea, how did you think the F-86 compared to the Russian Mig? Gabreski: Well, the F-86 was a little heavier airplane. It was a high-quality airplane. In other words, we built the F-86 like we built the P-47 or P-51. After talking to Chuck Yeager, who has flown the MIG-15 after it was brought into Edwards, he concluded that, well, it's very crude, it's very primitive, but it sure does the job. The Russians did not go in for all the refinements. They made the airplane very light for the amount of power that they had, which gave it a little bit better performance and rate of climb than the F-86. but, in a dive, the MiG would fall apart when you'd reach your terminal, what you'd call .95 or .96 Mach. And the F-86 had no problem except compressibility. Later, when we had the flying tail that was put on the newer 86's, we had no problems with compressibility. so, generally speaking, the MiG-15 during that period of time may have hada little better performance at high altitude due to the fact it was lighter and had a little bit more power. It was probably a little faster than the F-86. However, the comforts that the pilot had, the air conditioning, the pressurized cabin, they did not have. So if I had a choice between the F-86 and the MiG-15, I'd take the F-86 any day." CUNNINGHAM:"Did you feel like the Korean pilots ere well-trained in Korea?" GABRESKI:" On the contrary, the Korean pilots WERE IN training in Korea. I think that they were running a school. However, there were pilots that I encountered that were as good as any that I have ever seen any place. I have to assume from the intelligence reports and so forth that I have seen, that the Russians were training the students at a certain point when they brought them into combat. And the Russian pilots, every now and then, would break away and really encounter our force. And they were very good. Very good. But none of them had as much luck as we did-I think we shot down just about 8 MiG-15's for every F-86 that was shot down". Cunningham:"Does any one of those combats stand out in your mind?" ROBBINSON "ROBBIE" RISNER:"Yes, this MiG pilot was the toughest guy I ever flew against. When I knocked his canopy off, he made a 180-degree turn back into me, and I cut him off. Our F-86's could actually outturn 'em. Now the MiG could outclimb and outrun us, and had a superior altitude. But our airplane, I felt, was more stable and we could outturn 'em at medium or low altitude even though our airplane was heavier"...I'm almost ready to cut him down, you know. And he'd shove the stick forward and disappear out of my windshield in an inverted turn. Sometimes he would chop his throttle and throw out his speed brakes to throw me out front where he could nail me. Well, one thing we had better than they had, our speed brakes operated about twice or three times as fast."

I THINK THIS IS ENOUGH...TIRED OF WRITING.....I'D TAKE AN F-86, AND F-4, AN F-15, OR F-16 ANY DAY OF THE WEEK....THANKYOU....REFINEMENTS, RELIABILITY, DURABILITY, STABILITY, AND U.S.A. ON THE SIDE IS BETTER THAN RAW &UNUSABLE SPEED....MAYBE THAT FIGHTER SCHOOL IN ARIZONA CAN GO OVER IPM'S PROPERTY AND WE CAN GO AT IT! IT'S ONLY $1,000/PP....LET'S GET IT ON!



To: E. Charters who wrote (27552)11/19/1997 7:32:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson  Respond to of 35569
 
Eric; The allies had so many more planes that there were fewer German planes per pilot to shoot down on the western fronts, especially late in the war. This is seen in the large number of US pilots in the body of the report. Also late in the war the Germans were throwing all their new inexperienced pilots at the Russians on the eastern front, to face the more experienced soviet pilots, who for a long time had held back due to lack of planes to fight with.
The Soviets also had later newer planes from the lend-lease plan.

Eric; Did you also know the the USA lost the revolutionary war? Note that they speak English to this day, and not yankee. Just another lie of history.

Bill