Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (112939)	9/15/2011 8:57:43 AM
From: JakeStraw	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224705

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (112939)	9/15/2011 9:18:34 AM
From: locogringo	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224705

PPP has a Republican bias in past polls. kenny, kenny, kenny. Why do keep this bullcrap up. Catching you with this childish spinning is getting quite boring. Why didn't you post WHO said there was a Republican bias in past polls? None other than Nate SIlver ot he Times, not an independent observer, by any accounts. This is what he says about himself: Silver describes his own partisan orientation as follows in the FAQ on his website: "My state [Illinois] has non-partisan registration, so I am not registered as anything. I vote for Democratic candidates the majority of the time (though by no means always). This year, I have been a supporter of Barack Obama". [34] With respect to the impartiality of his electoral projections, Silver states, "Are [my] results biased toward [my] preferred candidates? I hope not, but that is for you to decide. I have tried to disclose as much about my methodology as possible". [34] Silver describes his ideological orientation as one of "rational progressivism": en.wikipedia.org