Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (79654)	9/15/2011 1:39:50 PM
From: elmatador	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219433

You need to understand how the rich world thinks. One: the rich countries cannot acknowledge a beating. In 1982 a third world country was about to humiliate UK, a NATO member. NATO ganged up together with the UK and prevented that. Two: During the Cold War the world was to be annihilated . Not North America and Eurasia who had capacity to bomb themselves to oblivion. It was the whole world. Then someone asked: Wait a moment! What does Brazil or Africa has to do with this mayhem? Oh, the rich world wanted to make sure no one would raise unscathed post-mayhem and claim the king of the place status. Thus bombs will fly to every human population!!! Therefore everybody was in the boat wanted or not Correlate the above with today's situation: One:Possibility BRICs's brought a quick USD flooding. The rich countries would acknowledged a beating had the BRICs ride to the rescue. Two: Today it is the whole world that is going to suffer if rich countries bite the dust. Wait a moment! I have not gone to party and I am going to feel the hangover? Yes. Otherwise those countries left standing would claim the king of the place status.

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (79654)	9/15/2011 4:52:06 PM
From: bart13	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219433

nowandfutures.com ;)