SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JakeStraw who wrote (112992)9/15/2011 3:47:32 PM
From: chartseer  Respond to of 224706
 
I know of people who paid in to social security all their lives and only got back $255.00 each.



To: JakeStraw who wrote (112992)9/15/2011 4:02:21 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224706
 
The more redistribution, the better. There is too much income inequality.



To: JakeStraw who wrote (112992)9/15/2011 4:07:15 PM
From: d[-_-]b3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224706
 
Krugman is so wrong - it's entirely redistributionist because a retirement plan invests in something and holds those assets for growth. If SS was an investment - we could get a prospectus and see it's yearly historical ROI.



To: JakeStraw who wrote (112992)9/15/2011 4:12:53 PM
From: chartseer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224706
 
I know of people who paid in to social security all their lives as did their employers and they only got back $255.00 each.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News