Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	9/15/2011 9:53:03 PM
From: CF Rebel	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224704

What am I missing? Unborn children are innocent. Criminals given a fair trial and found guilty are not innocent. Not hard to miss that difference. "death squads" that the TEA PARTY pushed Please expand and give citation. CF Rebel

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	9/15/2011 9:56:59 PM
From: steve harris	6 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224704

"death squads" that the TEA PARTY pushed during the healthcare debate How would you define Obama's statement summing up one aspect of his "health care" of sending grandma home with a pain pill and not the medical treatment to save her life? Economics?

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	9/16/2011 9:08:54 AM
From: locogringo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224704

Please explain where it is legal to take one life and have "death squads" that the TEA PARTY pushed during the healthcare debate. And you tell people that you laugh at me all day long? Maybe you should consider this: Message 27641070

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	9/16/2011 10:06:09 AM
From: joefromspringfield	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224704

"What am I missing?" You are talking about three different things: 1. Religious beliefs. 2. Political positions. 3. The law You are correctly pointing out that the three can be in conflict with each other. The late senator Kennedy, Pelosi, Kerry, and Biden are all pro choice. They claim to be Catholics. Their political position is at odds with the teachings of their religion. I believe the teachings of the catholic church are consistent and address every issue you cited. Pro life means no abortion and no state sponsored executions. Some wars are considered just. Extraordinary life support measures are left up the the individual but are not mandatory. If there are any teachings of the Catholic church that your feel are contradictory, let me know and I will try to answer. As for legal death, the date and time of death can be found on a persons death certificate. I suspect a medical authorities determines it. The law is always subject to change and can be inconsistent. It can even be immoral. Slavery is a good example. I have no idea what you are talking about when you wrote Tea party death squads. That sounds like some kind of smear campaign mounted by MSNBC or the DNC. I understand why the democratic party is scared to death of the Tea party. They are responsible for crushing defeats in elections since 2010. Attend one of their meeting and you will find they are ordinary working Americans who are concerned that their country is going broke and headed towards the same fate as Greece. It is a grass roots movement without a leader and has no allegiance to either party. Glen Beck's 912 event at the Washington Mall is a great example of what kind of people they are. The mall was cleaner when the left than it was when they arrived. Contrast that with the Wisconsin state capital building and the millions of dollars in damages caused by the union protesters.

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	1/14/2012 7:30:22 PM
From: locogringo	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224704

Comrade WIMP Paul V, thug and crybaby, this is a MOMENTOUS weekend for you, and I would like to be the first to bring it to your attention. It's not often that friends and people of good will get to celebrate HISTORIC anniversaries together. Tomorrow it will be 120 days since you BLATANTLY LIED and fabricated the phrase TEA PARTY DEATH SQUADS, AND NEVER, NOT EVEN ONCE, answered multiple polite queries about your intent and meaning. Please don't let the people here CONCLUDE that you are a IGNORANT, ARROGANT LYING POS, Comrade Paul V, THUG trainer and all around wimp, that pretends not to be around for over a week now. How am I going to keep these fine people from making that logical conclusion? Even JoeyBoy, your best friend besides kenny (who won't stick his neck out for you) are having trouble defending you. It's your move, Principal Paul V, educator and all around union thug. You gotta help me help you! BTW, Nobody has contacted me yet from that racist DOJ that has no idea what it is doing or saying. Maybe you should report me again. I'm not feeling the love and the chains that we can all believe in.

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	2/15/2012 7:04:24 PM
From: locogringo	9 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224704

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, Comrade THUG Paul V. Today is the 5 month anniversary of your SLIMY LIES about TEA PARTY DEATH SQUADS. Do you care to answer the handfull of questions about your lack of veracity from several threaders, or will you continue to be a wimp and hide from the TRUTH? Will you ever answer this simple question?

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	3/16/2012 10:19:18 AM
From: locogringo	5 Recommendations Respond to of 224704

Today is 6 months and one day that you have ignored repeated requests for clarification of your accusation concerning TEA PARTY DEATH SQUADS. Are you having a problem with the answer? Message 27640892

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	6/27/2012 10:00:47 AM
From: locogringo	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224704

Palin: If SCOTUS Upholds Obamacare, Congress Must Repeal “All of Obamacare must go one way or another,” Palin wrote. “As we wait for the impending Supreme Court decision on Obamacare, I reiterate what I wrote in my first post on this topic nearly three years ago,” Regarding that post, Palin said people seemed to have only read two words -- “death panel” -- in what was otherwise nuanced post. Palin also added that even though she was “called a liar for calling it like it is, many of these accusers finally saw that Obamacare did in fact create a panel of faceless bureaucrats who have the power to make life and death decisions about health care funding.” Palin, of course, was and is referring to the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB), and Palin said IPAB’s “purpose all along has been to ‘keep costs down’ by actually denying care via price controls and typically inefficient bureaucracy.” This is what Palin wrote about regarding the “subjective rationing of care” in her original Facebook post: The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil. breitbart.com

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	3/15/2014 8:44:12 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 224704

Today, March 15, 2014 is the 2½ year anniversary of Paul V's silly post about Tea Party Death Squads. Will he ever explain this nonsense? Message 27640892

To: Paul V. who wrote (113025)	9/15/2014 9:12:13 AM
From: locogringo	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Honey_Bee Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224704

Please explain where it is legal to take one life and have "death squads" that the TEA PARTY pushed during the healthcare debate. Message 27640892 Today is the 3rd anniversary of your ridiculous accusation about Tea Party Death Squads. You have never given links or proof of your statement. We know that Paul V is a THUG and pretends to be what he is not, but at least have the common decency to admit that you LIED and apologize to the thread. HTH