Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul V. who wrote (113085)	9/16/2011 5:53:28 PM
From: joefromspringfield	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224729

"Hell, we at a time in our life received an excellent salary to resolving such problems and achieve corporate goals." I doubt Loco has. I would never hire him. You said you would enjoy being his boss. It surprised me that you would even consider him for employment. Message 27635979

To: Paul V. who wrote (113085)	9/16/2011 7:46:04 PM
From: CF Rebel	8 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

I'm LMAO at this one. Joe, Kennedy, and other threaders, in response to Joe's question each of us should do some brainstorming and strategic planning.....[blah, blah, blah]. Let me break it to ya Paul V. - Joe didn't ask a question. He quoted you from a prior post. Why would he ask you a question, word for word, that you asked? Just a little wake up call here - you write and think like a bureaucrat. Just think about that a while. When responding to others you rarely directly address a given issue. You dance around it and find it so hard to be direct and get to the point. You, like most liberals and bureaucrats, are obsessed with process rather than getting to a result. You'd rather discuss the fuel/air mixture in a cylinder instead of the where the car is going. For example, in your post to Joe we find crap like this: "strategic planning," "restraining forces," "driving forces," "reflecting on the problem," "forces which have the tendency to block our achievement," ad nauseum. That stuff had nothing to do with Joe's post. I've seen your lack of reading comprehension in your responses to me, too, and as a result I have little reason to take your posts seriously. If time had no value I still wouldn't bother spinning my wheels with you. Clarity and economy of words should be your goal. You'd do well to make it so. And using truth and a good dose of morality would go a long way to getting respect. CF Rebel