SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (172150)9/16/2011 8:17:22 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542193
 
<<<Some of the stimulus money like the tax cuts for the middle class and cash for clunkers - much of that money ends up in China. (Keynesian - yes) BUT, BUT, BUT not stimulative here in America. If the government borrows money and gives you a tax cut and go out and buy a new television with that money it is NOT stimulative to our economy even though it is Keynesian type spending. Why not; if it leaves America it doesn't turn over in the economy - doesn't stimulate. It is debt, it is Keynesian in nature (since the goverment is using deficit spending) but it is not stimulative. >>>

Our economy is driven 70% by consumer spending. We have a global economy. Consumer spending has a local ripple effect.

There are several assumptions in your paragraph that are disturbing. But stimulating our economy has a global impact. We are not isolated. Keynesian economics examines the impact of international commerce and is part and parcel of macro economics from a purely subjective perspective. If we can buy things cheaper from aboard than we can "manufacture" it ourselves - that helps to increase our standard of living.

There are times in cash management, no matter how wealthy or poor you are, i t may be wise to borrow money to stimulate your economy - but that is what the study of Macro economics is all about - that understanding - among other things.