Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CommanderCricket who wrote (157284)	9/19/2011 11:08:30 AM
From: upanddown	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206099

CC How does a "English technical analyst" with a diploma no less, talk about OIL PRICES without mentioning $111 Brent or the Cushing bottleneck problems? Cushing stores about 10% of domestic production. Can we assume that approx 10% of domestic production is subject to Cushing pricing? It can't be much more than that. If we accept 10%, that means that Cushing prices apply to less than 1% of world crude production and this guy ONLY mentions Cushing prices? Time to take advantage of this kind of clownish thinking. Two weeks to the end of the third quarter. World oil prices have to have averaged above $110 for the entire quarter. I'm looking for candidates to likely hit it out of the park with 3rd qtr earnings. Criteria would be... little or no crude production subject to WTI prices mostly oil growing production big enough to be noticed All ideas welcome. John