Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: raybiese who wrote (157382)	9/20/2011 1:42:16 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206085

Ray, Thanks for the excellent review. As always - I am impressed by resources here and the willingness of the holders of knowledge to share it. I am now even more convinced we should be "investing" in CNG infrastructure instead of trains to no where. Bob

To: raybiese who wrote (157382)	9/20/2011 9:16:51 PM
From: akmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206085

Hello Ray, What impact would extreme cold temps have on the opex? It would seem that this would be a natural way to monetize the stranded gas on the North Slope. (Plenty of valuable uplifted crude from the pressurization of the CO2 sequestration) It is my belief that TAPS could be re-pigged to accommodate product as well as crude for around $1 billion. Even with most of the product being diesel, it could be delivered to the Cal. market very cheaply. Perhaps XOM and COP shedding West Coast refining might make this idea more politically possible? Many thanks for your input. Mike