Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Dividend investing for retirement -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mannie who wrote (10028)	9/21/2011 7:33:28 PM
From: rnsmth	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34328

Microsoft has been dead money for a decade, and it has seen its best. If a relatively low divvy is enough to attract you, then go for it. They have missed the mobile computing boat and releasing Windows 8 for tablets in a year or more from now is not going to be terribly helpful to them. If they can maintain a good dividend growth rate, then maybe a case can be made, but there are better regulated monopolies out there for me to put money into a declining unregulated monopoly - and I am talking about their Office suite here, not their OS business which is slowly bleeding market share.

To: Mannie who wrote (10028)	9/26/2011 7:18:53 PM
From: Jacob Snyder	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34328

re MSFT: I prefer INTC to MSFT. INTC has a modestly higher dividend. More importantly, MSFT has legacy products, and has failed to expand into growth software areas. Many people think INTC has the same problem, but I disagree. Intel's core competence is as a manufacturer. Their designs for PC chips aren't really better than what AMD makes, but they consistently execute better. They produce chips better than anyone else, and have for a long time. So, their future is not solely tied to the PC. Intel may transition to being a contract manufacturer, making a wide variety of chips for different applications. In addition, barriers to entry in chip-making are getting steadily higher. As geometries get smaller, the cost of a chip factory increases, and the difficulty of the process increases. Intel excels at solving these problems. With each industry cycle, there are fewer and fewer companies who can compete in leading-edge production techniques. With software, it's still possible to make a product which competes with the software of leading companies, with modest initial capital. Software has lower barriers to entry.