SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (628941)9/21/2011 12:40:06 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577019
 
Z, > And have you seen how many people are living at less than half the poverty level these days?

Heritage Foundation did a study on what poor people in America have to suffer through:

heritage.org

The reason is that poverty levels these days are relative to the rest of the nation. But in absolute terms, the living conditions of the poor have improved compared to several decades ago.

I'm sure your gut reaction will be "You uncaring bastard!" But I never said that we should stop caring for the poor. That's completely heartless.

What I am against, though, is throwing rationality out the window in the name of helping the poor. Using our heads as well as our hearts is the best strategy to combating poverty.

Tenchusatsu



To: SilentZ who wrote (628941)9/21/2011 1:13:29 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577019
 
If a charity has tens of millions to give out and there are people in their city w/o enough food, they should learn to better prioritize their giving. I'll bet they have the means to keep anyone from being hungry in NYC. Stop paying high paid consultants and put rice and beans and canned good in food pantries.