SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (2457)9/21/2011 2:11:06 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
I read a piece by the guy who interviewed Hansen and he said he asked him what would be different in 20 years. His name was Rob Reiss and the interview was in 1988 or 1989.

dir.salon.com

I understand Hansen has gotten Reiss to say Hansen really said 40 years. But 40 years is going to put us in 2028. There will still be people around who remember the 1988 statement so safer to say 80 years.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (2457)9/21/2011 3:02:03 PM
From: HPilot1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
The important thing is the doubling of the CO2, since it, rather than time, is the greenhouse gas.

A doubling of little more than nothing, is still little more than nothing. So it goes up from .03% to .06%, there still isn't enough CO2 to have a dramatic impact.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News