Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (2479)	9/21/2011 2:48:22 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Respond to of 85487

That's a recent GISS temperature chart. Can anyone explain why in 1980, GISS said 1940 was warmer than 1980 but by 1987, that had changed? How does one justify changing the past? Message 27645276 1940 BTW do you agree or disagree that the earth has only 16 months left before it can't be saved? guardian.co.uk President 'has four years to save Earth' US must take the lead to avert eco-disaster *Read the full interview with James Hansen here* *Robin McKie* in New York The Observer, Saturday 17 January 2009

To: Land Shark who wrote (2479)	9/21/2011 2:52:56 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	5 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

Brumar89 has posted several times how GISS's historical temperature data changed after Hansen took over. By now GISS's temperature record deviates significantly from HADCRUT and UAH temperature datasets. Also, tell me, if the promised warming has shown up on schedule, exactly what is it that Trenberth clearly feels the need to explain? This whole field is starting to resemble the old Soviet era joke: The future is known. It's the past that keeps changing!