SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (2483)9/21/2011 3:02:42 PM
From: Nadine Carroll2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Please notice that all Steven Goddard is doing here is reading the data from charts published by GISS and UAH. The GISS chart is the one you posted. The UAH equivalent chart is completely different for the period 1980 - 2008. This is divergence, no?

Divergence Between GISS and UAH since 1980
Posted on January 17, 2009 by Anthony Watts
Guest post by Steven Goddard

The GISS website shows the graph below, which indicates a steady, steep warming trend over the last 30 years. The monthly average anomaly for 2008 (0.44) is 0.26 degrees warmer than the monthly average anomaly for 1980 (0.18.) Data obtained from here: woodfortrees.org




data.giss.nasa.gov
By contrast, the UAH monthly average anomaly for 2008 (0.05) is 0.04 degrees cooler than the UAH monthly average anomaly for 1980 (0.09.) Again, data obtained from here: woodfortrees.org


woodfortrees.org


This 1980-2008 discrepancy between GISS and UAH is important, as it is nearly equal to the claimed warming trend since 1980.
wattsupwiththat.com



To: Land Shark who wrote (2483)9/21/2011 3:19:21 PM
From: HPilot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
LOL not the same data sets he reffered too!. But several that also used the Anglican story book, hide the decline, data set.