SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul V. who wrote (113553)9/21/2011 10:29:26 PM
From: joefromspringfield4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224756
 
If you don't trust Rasmussen, look at Gallup.


GALLUP.com/poll/149552/Perry-Looks-Better-Against-Romney-Against-Obama.aspx' target='_blank'>http://www.GALLUP.com/poll/149552/Perry-Looks-Better-Against-Romney-Against-Obama.aspx




To: Paul V. who wrote (113553)9/21/2011 10:32:48 PM
From: locogringo8 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224756
 
I have always wondered, after seeing Fox News constantly quoting Rasmussen, whether the Rasmussen had a negative bias against the Democrat's. Thanks for posting the above information.

WAIT A MINUTE!!

Where.......EXACTLY where in that chart do you see a negative bias against democrats?

7 out of 8 (perhaps you should read the thread before you open your ignorant mouth) reported bias..................

NONE of them reported NEGATIVE bias against democrats. If so, in your twisted mind, are you accusing CNN of negative democratic bias? Are you accusing Quinnipiac of negative democratic bias? Are you accusing PPP of negative democratic bias?

Why do you feel the need to LIE to support a position that is unsupportable with your voluminous experience and extensive advanced training? (translation=total baloney)

#2. When are you going to answer the simple questions put to you?