SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (53838)9/22/2011 5:50:57 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom2 Recommendations  Respond to of 95530
 
Graphene Could Replace Silicon, But Chip Firms Lag
By REINHARDT KRAUSE, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 09/21/2011 06:34 PM ET

Observers hail graphene as a new wonder material that could replace silicon in chips and change electronics and other sectors. Just one problem: The semiconductor equipment industry has yet to jump on the graphene bandwagon by developing gear and manufacturing tools to handle the material.

But graphene research is booming at U.S. universities. R&D labs are developing uses for graphene in communications devices, solar cells, flexible touch-screens, aircraft materials, gas tanks and more. The labs, out of necessity, use their own in-house techniques for graphene-related research.



The chip equipment industry must play a bigger role, says Michael Fritze, director of the disruptive technologies program at the Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.

"A step in the right direction would be to have some high-quality commercial tools available," he said.

Many obstacles exist to commercializing products based on graphene, a one-atom-thick sheet of carbon that's organized like chicken wire in molecular form. Graphene, a form of graphite, wasn't discovered until 2004. The material, though, got a big boost in October. That's when Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, two University of Manchester, England, scientists, were awarded the Nobel Prize in physics for their pioneering research on graphene.

The material is said to be 100 times stronger than steel and conducts electricity as well as copper. Thus it's touted as a replacement for silicon in computer chips. Researchers plan to use it also to strengthen plastics, coatings and conductive inks such as those that provide copper etchings on chips.

Small CVD Equipment ( CVV) is among leaders in graphene, looking to sell it to universities and industrial researchers. The Ronkonkoma, N.Y.-based company had sales of just $7.5 million last quarter, but its early work in graphene has helped the stock.

Germany's Aixtron ( AIXG) also is an early leader in graphene.

But Applied Materials ( AMAT) and other leading makers of manufacturing gear used to make chips, flat-panel displays and solar panels have stayed on the sidelines. None has yet disclosed they are actively developing gear that would be used to put ultrathin graphene layers on copper, plastic or glass substrates.

Chip gear companies, though, have shown interest.

In May, USC's Fritze headed a graphene conference that brought together university researchers and companies. He says gear makers such as Applied Materials seemed to be in serious talks with other attendees.

Some Production Under Way

Graphene is produced in very small amounts by U.S. companies such as Vorbeck Materials, XG Sciences and Angstron Materials, says a Lux Research report. Some universities bake their own graphene in high-temperature ovens. The big challenge for researchers is developing manufacturing tools, says Lux Research analyst Jonathan Melnick.

"Research is still at a basic, fundamental level of getting graphene into products," Melnick said. "They're trying to figure out cheaper, more efficient ways to produce graphene. It's a challenge getting (manufacturing) scale up and costs down."

Samsung and Texas Instruments ( TXN) are among chipmakers with graphene-related R&D under way. Samsung last year licensed graphene patents from Unidym, a unit of Arrowhead Research ( ARWR).

"Many university research labs are looking at graphene. IBM ( IBM) has done a lot of work. Intel ( INTC) has R&D," said Dean Freeman, an analyst at market research firm Gartner. "But it's still sandbox, early-stage type work. There's nothing close to volume production.

"If graphene moves closer to reality, then you will see (big) equipment companies looking at how to address the market."

CVD Equipment last year teamed with startup Graphene Laboratories to sell graphene substrate services to universities and industrial labs. CVD hasn't disclosed its graphene sales, though they likely remain quite small.

The big question remains whether graphene is the real thing, not another overhyped technology such as carbon nanotubes. Scientists say it'll be at least five to 10 years before applications of graphene technology come to market.

USC's Fritze, however, says thin films of graphene have been successfully put on wafers, opening the door to electronics applications. There are hurdles, though. While graphene conducts electricity, researchers have yet to develop on/off switches in circuitry as in silicon-based devices.

Freeman says graphene-based devices will emerge first for communications devices that don't require digital switches, such as high-frequency microwave transmitters used in satellites.

Fritze says graphene sheets have been put on bigger-size substrates for various purposes. He says "smart windows" is one area of research, especially in South Korea. Smart glass controls how much light and heat passes through.

How soon graphene-based products emerge "depends on how seriously companies invest in it and what the potential looks like after they kick the tires," Fritze said.

Many startups have sprouted, some spun out of university labs. In June, Korean steel firm Posco acquired a 20% stake in XG Sciences, a spin-off of Michigan State University. Texas-based Graphene Energy is working on energy storage.

Graphene is a two-dimensional form of graphite, basically pencil lead. Companies that sell graphite are moving into graphene.

investors.com



To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (53838)9/22/2011 6:17:25 PM
From: Return to Sender4 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 95530
 
We might get a bottom despite the FED attempting to support the market Don. There is a serious disconnect going on here. Money goes to big business which has done very little in the way of hiring anyone to work here in the good old USA. Yes, banks have enough money to avoid defaults but they sure are not loaning much of it out to anyone even if they are good risks. Most people are seriously underwater on their mortgages and cannot even refinance.

Yes, companies that are multinational in nature have done well over the last couple of years but our economy is largely driven by consumer spending right here at home. How much money have you spent lately?

Okay, last week I bought a new iPod (I get my music essentially for free now) but my laptop is two years old. I usually upgrade every two years. I probably won't this year as it's working fine.

My house is worth less than it was.
My business has been in decline for years.
My trading account brought in more money last year than my business but it will not this year. That's despite my business making less this year than last.

I have not bought a new car since 2005. I always pay cash for them and it is running fine. I used to buy new every 4 to 5 years. I won't this year either.

I'm a small businessman who has zero incentives to hire anyone new at work. In fact I could let someone go. I could even retire early and simply trade stocks. I think I can make money long or short doing it but I like my job. If I do my employees will be out of work with almost no chance of finding a job.

I would hate to do that to them when I am only 54.

Anyhow there is no real help on the horizon no matter how many dollars the FED prints because they are not filtering down to the small businessman who employs most of the workers throughout our country. We have so many people out of work already and who is going to hire them.

Enough of that for now Don.

RtS



To: Donald Wennerstrom who wrote (53838)9/22/2011 10:36:17 PM
From: The Ox2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 95530
 
I would beg to differ on your point: "The Fed has been "pumping money" into the stock market for a long time now...".

I don't believe this is true at all. While the Fed has been printing dollars, it has been funnelled into the banking system and into treasuries. I'm of the opinion that very, very little of this money is reaching the stock market. Quite the opposite, in my opinion.

One would think that lower and lower interest rates would create demand in the equities markets but I really don't think this is the case. Money that could be put into the market remains on the sidelines, for the most part. With the exception of retirement funding, 401Ks and the like, I don't think we are seeing people (or many institutions, for that matter) put money into the markets.

I believe many of the major companies in the US are financially sound and are being run very conservatively. They are sitting on their cash, like many individuals.

I for one am moving away from many of the smaller cap names and looking into larger, more stable companies. Companies that have been performing well, even in the face of the tough headwinds of our lousy economy.

Fear has a significant portion of the world caught like a deer in a car's headlights. These manic swings we are seeing on nearly a daily basis in the world markets is doing little to calm this fear. Add the inability of our politicians (on both sides of the aisle) to have even the slightest bit of understanding how their divisive vitriol has poisoned not only their constituents but the rest of the world's view of American politics. When compromise is considered an evil in Washington, why should anyone expect the markets to remain calm??

The above comments are not intended to turn the conversation towards politics, quite the opposite. They are referenced by me because they are a direct force enhancing the basic underlying fear of investing in stocks.

jmo

TO