SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: orkrious who wrote (41963)9/23/2011 6:46:22 PM
From: Roads End3 Recommendations  Respond to of 119360
 
I'm with Fleck on the conspiracy issue but as for advance notification of the pending increase there can't be any doubt. Equally certain is that there will be no investigation or charges brought against the parties using the advanced information.



To: orkrious who wrote (41963)9/23/2011 9:23:09 PM
From: ItsAllCyclical7 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 119360
 
What's ridiculous is they picked a time when gold/silver were already heading down, gen market weak and you had gold futures rolling over (monthly expiration). For Fleck to dismiss out of hand is equally ridiculous.

I don't put everything on the margin hike, but the fact that a select few knew about it prior and helped manipulate certainly doesn't sit well with me.

At the end of day gold/silver are liquidity indicators. Right now it's being withdrawn from the system and this will continue until something breaks.

I just say thanks for the buying op.

If you're low on physical buy this weekend. Best way to stick it to them is to permanently take supply off the table... at least till gold hits 5K+.



To: orkrious who wrote (41963)9/24/2011 3:20:30 AM
From: benwood  Respond to of 119360
 
I computed the gold leverage, it was 6-to-1 after the hike. Somebody chime in and correct me if I was wrong. That doesn't seem that out of line to me. But what do I know...?