Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (113776)	9/24/2011 2:47:01 PM
From: tonto	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224748

Newt may very well be the most capable...he certainly is intelligent and knows how to move people in Washington.

To: lorne who wrote (113776)	9/24/2011 4:50:32 PM
From: MJ	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224748

Lorne I missed the most recent debate------caught the one before this week.. I still want a winning 'combination' of Pres. and VP and I want two hard hitters plus a Secretary of State that has America's interest in mind and not that of the UN or other nations. I want two candidates who will mince no words in stating the obvious for America. I don't want Obama or another Obama in philosophy. If any of the present candidates will be a clone of Obama, Pelosi, Reid or Kerry then that needs to be revealed now-------also let's throw in the Clintons and Sibelius. There are still two people that have yet to declare one way or another--------Trump and Palin. Both are articulate ------------Trump is a master at stating a position and pushing a person into giving a response. Trump is tough. He has even talked of doing a third party candidacy as an independent; at this time I see no indication he will do so---------and I would hope he will not do so as that would a scenario similar to when Perot ran and Clinton won. I too like Cain; however, I don't believe he is ready for the Presidency---- Vice President perhaps. I do see a combination in which either Palin or Bachmann is the choice for Vice President absent either of them being the Presidential Nominee. Very likely, we will see a compromise combination--------------much as we had with Reagan and Bush. Reagan was a true blue conservative------while Bush of the CIA fame was imo not. Bush made the promise of "No New Taxes" at the GOP Convention in 1988 and failed to keep his promise. That was the reason that Ross Perot ran and the 'no new tax supporters' supported Perot. There are a lot of players here---------so let's see what this national chess board produces. This is today's ramblings ----subject to change another day mj