SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Big Black Swan who wrote (80418)9/27/2011 5:34:50 AM
From: Maurice Winn4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217792
 
Are you really proud of that BS comment? < would look excellent in bed. A more suitable place for her. > Anyone for a few gentlemanly VVV? Would you be okay if somebody wrote such a thing about your wife or daughter? I guess so or you wouldn't have written it.

Mqurice



To: Big Black Swan who wrote (80418)9/27/2011 12:33:52 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217792
 
Bridget is chronically stupid. Our non-Canadian friends have no idea of the history of Canadian business reporting. The announcer in the office looks like she is in a trance and probably is. She would never think of questioning what Bridget is saying because it would affect her hangover. Gold does the backing, she should read up on it, or watch a movie, poor silly cow. What she should have said is no major currency is backed by gold and these currencies are make believe.

youtube.com

Quote from the Treasure of the Sierra Madre.

Howard
: Say, answer me this one, will you? Why is gold worth some twenty bucks an ounce?
Flophouse Bum: I don't know. Because it's scarce.
Howard: A thousand men, say, go searchin' for gold. After six months, one of them's lucky: one out of a thousand. His find represents not only his own labor, but that of nine hundred and ninety-nine others to boot. That's six thousand months, five hundred years, scramblin' over a mountain, goin' hungry and thirsty. An ounce of gold, mister, is worth what it is because of the human labor that went into the findin' and the gettin' of it.
Flophouse Bum: I never thought of it just like that.
Howard: Well, there's no other explanation, mister. Gold itself ain't good for nothing except making jewelry with and gold teeth.

When Bridget isn't perming her ears should might like to read this by the former head of the US Federal Reserve.

GOLD - by Alan Greenspan

Gold and economic freedom are inseparable, . . . the gold standard is an instrument of laissez-faire and . . . each implies and requires the other.

What medium of exchange will be acceptable to all participants in an economy is not determined arbitrarily. Where store-of-value considerations are important, as they are in richer, more civilized societies, the medium of exchange must be a durable commodity, usually a metal. A metal is generally chosen because it is homogeneous and divisible: every unit is the same as every other and it can be blended or formed in any quantity. Precious jewels, for example, are neither homogeneous nor divisible.

More important, the commodity chosen as a medium must be a luxury. Human desires for luxuries are unlimited and, therefore, luxury goods are always in demand and will always be acceptable . . . .

The term “luxury good” implies scarcity and high unit value. Having a high unit value, such a good is easily portable; for instance, an ounce of gold is worth a half-ton of pig iron . . . .

Under the gold standard, a free banking system stands as the protector of an economy’s stability and balanced growth.

In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold . . . .

The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.

This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the “hidden” confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.



To: Big Black Swan who wrote (80418)9/28/2011 4:49:53 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217792
 
EM infrastructure: money to be made
September 28, 2011 8:22 pm by David Keohane

0 inShare0 0

Airports, roads and railways may be the most visible elements of emerging market infrastructure investment. But they are all dwarfed by spending on electricity generation and transmission.

Electricity investment already counts for nearly half of EM infrastructure investment. And if a study published on Wednesday by Cambridge University and the Royal Bank of Scotland is correct, it will amount to around two-thirds of the total over the next 20 years. That’s a lot of power – and a lot of contracts.

RBS is forecasting a doubling of EM infrastructure spending between now and 2030 from $7,500bn in the last twenty years to $19,200bn (+158%). As the chart below shows, electricity investment will quadruple from $3,600bn to $12,700bn:



The vast majority of spending will continue to be concentrated in Asia which was responsible for over two thirds of total EM infrastructure spending between 1991 and 2011- RBS is predicting a further $15,800bn, a 207 per cent increase from the previous two decades. However, the report predicts that Africa will benefit from the highest growth rates ( helped in no small part by Chinese investment) as its urbanising population grows. Nigeria, in particular, is expected to see the highest demand for infrastructure globally between 2011 and 2030.

The report notes that central and east European countries, bar Turkey, will probably not see an increase in infrastructure spending (due to established infrastructures and declining populations) but that Latin America and the Middle East (which is the only EM region creating “infrastructure overcapacity”) will both push ahead quickly.



The report expects electricity to continue to dominate investment with spending forecast to quadruple over the next 20 years, from $3,600bn to $12,700bn. China, unsurprisingly, towers above other EM countries in terms of electricity capacity and investment and should remain the global heavyweight.

That said, RBS expect high rates of growth in electricity spending from underdeveloped nations in Asia and Africa.

Nigeria’s compound annual growth rate (CAGR), for example, needs to reach 5.9 per cent in order to meet demand, while Angola needs 5.8 per cent and India 7.7 per cent. Vietnam (6.9 per cent), Indonesia (5.7 per cent) and the Philippines (3.9 per cent) all also need to invest to keep up with demand.

By contrast, RBS expect flat or marginal growth in electricity spending in Central and Eastern European economies which already benefit from good infrastructure and have slowing population growth which will retard demand. By way of contrast, Ukraine enjoys almost 8 times the electricity capacity of Nigeria, despite Nigeria being a larger economy.



Surprisingly, while the report sees a fall of 60 per cent in fixed line investment it still expects a not insignificant amount to be spent, some $200bn, particularly in Africa and Asia. Vietnam, the Philippines and Kenya are expected to need CAGRs of 3.9 per cent, 3.1 per cent and 2.8 per cent. RBS believe that the growth of broadband technology, which “to date still requires fixed telephone lines”, will drive investment. Whether this is true or not remains to be seen.



Mobile phone use is the reason behind the fall in fixed line investment and it’s easy to see why. The technology has only been present in EM markets for 15 years but its uptake in that time has been phenomenal. RBS note that many countries now boast more subscriptions than citizens with the UAE counting 208 mobile subscriptions per 100 people in 2010 while Hong Kong and Bahrain counted 177 and 190 per 100 people in the same year. Even countries nearer the bottom of the pile like India (46 subscriptions per 100 people) and China (73 subscriptions per 100) record high numbers.

However, this penetration is not uniform and RBS expects high growth in Africa with Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt and Angola seeing the highest growth over the next two decades with CAGRs above 6.5 per cent.



Railroads aren’t as necessary as they used to be and, while predicting an increase in spending, the report notes that many EM countries, mainly in the Middle East, have chosen not to invest in them. However, RBS do see future spending in some countries with the fastest growth being seen in Peru (1.1 per cent CAGR), Angola (1.1 per cent CAGR) and the Philippines (1.1 per cent CAGR).



Investment in roads meanwhile is expected to nearly double, from $2, 200bn to $4,200bn. And some of the increases will be dramatic. According to RBS, India will need to double its road network over the next 20 years, from an already enormous 2.3m km to near 5m km. The highest growth after India will come from Vietnam, Thailand and Kenya.



To: Big Black Swan who wrote (80418)9/29/2011 5:56:43 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 217792
 
Ranking of foreign students in US universities during the 2009–10 academic year: China, 127.000, India 100.000, South Korea 72.000, Brazil 9.000.