SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (172747)9/27/2011 12:10:17 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540901
 
Makes sense.
---------------------------------------------
Political Animal Blog
September 27, 2011 10:00 AM
Making good use of unruly GOP audiences
By Steve Benen

Audience reactions during recent Republican presidential debates have, quite unexpectedly, become a pretty significant story unto themselves. What started with a GOP audience applauding the executions of 234 people was followed by some shouts for allowing the uninsured die, culminating last week with some debate attendees booing an Army soldier serving in Iraq.

The Democratic National Committee released this web video yesterday, connecting the three incidents, and emphasizing the fact that none of the Republican candidates were willing to speak up during the events.

The clip makes good use of an editorial from the Concord Monitor in New Hampshire, which said, “The most disturbing aspect of the WrestleMania behavior at the debates is not that some audience members booed a soldier and many cheered death. It’s that not one Republican candidate … spoke up to admonish the crowd and call for civility. Not one candidate, in situations that cried out for it, exhibited leadership.”

It’s not just the DNC. President Obama has reminded supporters about the debate audiences during his West Coast trip, and his chief spokesperson stressed a similar point yesterday.

…White House press secretary Jay Carney elaborated on the president’s remarks, saying, “There was a question asked by a soldier, a U.S. soldier stationed in Iraq, about ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and the fact that when he was booed by audience members, not a single one of the candidates for president, people who believe they have what it takes to be commander in chief, said a thing about that. And he is there defending our country, putting his life on the line for our country.

“The president was also struck by, in an earlier debate, where the hypothetical question was asked about someone who didn’t have health insurance that had died and there were cheers at that prospect and no candidate had anything to say about that,” Carney said. “It’s a matter of values. It’s a matter of who we are as Americans.”

There’s more to this than just shining a light on unruly GOP extremism. As Carney put it, “It’s a matter of values” — the White House, as it gears up for the 2012 race, will be looking for ways to connect with voters, many of whom are disgusted with Washington and dejected by high unemployment. It makes the “values” pitch appealing — the message to voters is less about specific economic conditions and more about character and the principles of the American mainstream, which Republicans frequently reject.

President Obama told supporters in Los Angeles last night the upcoming election is “about values; it’s about character; it’s about who we are.” And “we,” in this case, aren’t the kind of people who boo soldiers serving overseas or cheer letting the uninsured die.

Keep an eye on this; it’s likely to be a theme we’ll be hearing a lot more of over the next year.



To: JohnM who wrote (172747)9/27/2011 1:13:12 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540901
 
Solyndra was a total misfire. It is my hope that from this, the bickering politicians in DC will learn that as they feud and bicker with the goal of pulling one another down, it is the scoundrels, the US capitalists, who will stand to benefit and the people who will lose. There are a lot of skeletons in the closet that Solyndra has produced as is evident from your post. Notice that in this post there is still no political evidence of political influence on the decision and that both shades of political opinions had a role in this bad decision. But the politicians are oblivious to all that and like stooges continue to point fingers at each other.

In 2012, bump those imbeciles off.
============================================
Solyndra's meltdown raises questions about the fallen solar star
Energy Department's risky moves among investigators' concerns

By George Avalos
Oakland Tribune
Posted: 09/26/2011 04:22:39 PM PDT
Updated: 09/27/2011 06:07:27 AM PDT

...excerpt

So far, no smoking guns have been unearthed to prove political influence had anything to do with the company's loan.

....contd at mercurynews.com