Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HungryLion who wrote (27598)	11/19/1997 12:22:00 PM
From: Texas77	Respond to of 35569

<<You don't buy a stock like IPM for quick profits.>> Hey Lion, Do you think he forgot to add that because if you did it would be more difficult for the insiders to churn and work the stock.

To: HungryLion who wrote (27598)	11/19/1997 12:44:00 PM
From: Anne Lamb	Respond to of 35569

oh..youre such a sleuth!! i'm so impressed..as it was posted yesterday i have to say you really pulled a rabbit outta the hat! woooo.. now..i quake as i write this.. but..but ..do you think you could.. like..POST THE SEPT PRESS RELEASE????? oh my God..it would just be such a revelation to us..and you clever lil lion..spose you could leak the news that..<tremble> THERE WAS AN AGM IN JUNE????? Keep it coming Unemployed Poster Boy..

To: HungryLion who wrote (27598)	11/19/1997 12:49:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Kitty, thanks, but that's very old. Time to change your litter? Where is Hall when you need him?

To: HungryLion who wrote (27598)	11/19/1997 1:14:00 PM
From: Eastman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Now that IPM has released their numbers, I wish that I had followed my gut reaction during the summer. These results confirm that the company "twisted the truth" for months regarding what they had in BRX. Having followed the IPM story as a shareholder for nearly 2 years, I'm now convinced that their were several tell-tale signs of a disappointment. Here is a brief list of facts that you should consider before leveraging the ranch to take part in this "unbelievable buying opportunity": 1. Missed deadlines for results. 2. The involvement of BD, Lycopodium, and others whom have taken a greatly reduced role. (How many experts can the hire?) 3. Recent results are no better than a year-ago time frame, regardless of AGM promises or various press releases. 4. The "shady" nature of the purchase agreement for the BRX property (How long is Phoenix International (original owner) going to accept interest payments (I'd guess these are phantom payments at this point), and if the property were so valuable, why would they sell it? 5. My final reason is that the top management owns LESS THAN 500,000 SHARES OF THE COMPANY. 2 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OWN NO STOCK, AND ONE DIRECTOR OWNS 1,000 SHARES. ASK YOURSELF THIS, HAVE YOU EVER HEARD SOMEONE SAY I'VE GOT ENOUGH MONEY?? IF YOU WERE LEE OR ALAN, WOULDN'T YOU BORROW EVER PENNY YOU COULD GET YOUR HANDS ON TO BUY MORE SHARES?? If this stock is a king maker, they would know it. Insider trading would not prohibit them from buying stock based upon public information (previously released new-fangled assay values) as long as they filed. A few final thoughts-- this technology that they claim to have is obviously a ways off. They've been promising for quite some time now with no verifiable results. How many experts can they hire that will tell them that their process won't/can't work (remember, these are supposedly the brightest people in mining...why wouldn't they be able to understand the process???) If the management is not willing to invest their hard earned money, with the considerably larger information base that they have, why should we? Don't blame the shorts...they were right all along. No longer a believer...sorry to say, East

To: HungryLion who wrote (27598)	11/19/1997 1:21:00 PM
From: Graystone	Respond to of 35569

Mattc wipe your chin. Ronnie is busy playing a game right now. See Paper Rock Scissors Paper exchange2000.com Rock exchange2000.com Scissors exchange2000.com It should be obvious that I am scissors, thanks Roger. It might have worked if you had chosen Hehegdeclipper. exchange2000.com I made it clear what I thought of Rons advice. exchange2000.com Words posted by a SI personality known as the HungryLion. Attributed to Ro()n Struthers. This may appropriately be termed middle level yadda. "I believe the news release on Friday was very significant. It does not tell us how much gold is at BRX or how much platinum. We can not draw conclusions of a huge 50 million oz deposit of precious metals. It is my opinion that only one plain and simple conclusion can be drawn from Fridays news release and that is:" "THINK" "RE-READ" "IS IT HYPE OR MINING" I put out a recommendation here. The Painted Lady exchange2000.com I tried to shed a little light on Rons role here The Spin Doctors exchange2000.com "(IPM)" has been stringing you along, look for yourself. Imagine that this may happen again, same scenario, different price levels. The Saga exchange2000.com I don't know if any of you bother to check the dates-quotes but they are all true. For example, "briles" are you there, care to have another stab at the interview, you have been here long enough. Interview with a Moron exchange2000.com I think everything that needs to be said has been said. Long ago. The Vivisection exchange2000.com Thanks for the image Karl Zetmeier. exchange2000.com