Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Spongetech -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (31)	9/29/2011 11:45:52 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 259

09/28/2011 182 Letter re: monthly living expenses of defendant Moskowitz by U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission (Kisslinger, Paul) (Entered: 09/28/2011) Doc 182 PDF file viewer.zoho.com OCR extract - Your Honor: Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“the Commission”) writes with respect to the Court’s Order dated September 13, 2011 [Dkt. 175] ordering an asset freeze as to defendant Steven Y. Moskowitz. The Order directed the parties to agree on a monthly allowance of reasonable and necessary living expenses for Mr. Moskowitz, and to submit a proposed Order to the Court. Id. at paragraphs 4 and 5. We write to inform the Court that the parties have been unable to agree on a monthly living allowance for Mr. Moskowitz. Mr. Moskowitz’s counsel submitted a schedule indicating monthly living expenses of $27,850 per month. The Commission objected to these expenses as excessive, and in response, drafted a proposed Order that provides for a monthly allowance in the amount of $5072, representing $2272 for mortgage and real estate taxes, and $2800 for household and personal expenses. Counsel for Mr. Moskowitz has countered at $15,000, but no less, and the Commission cannot agree to this amount. As the parties have been unable to resolve this issue, we respectfully request the assistance of Your Honor or the Magistrate Judge. Respectfully submitted,

To: scion who wrote (31)	9/29/2011 8:55:53 PM
From: DanDerr	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 259

He should get $5 per week and 3 or 4 Meals on Wheels a per week! And he should perform Public Service Cleaning Public Toilets in City Parks.

To: scion who wrote (31)	10/4/2011 2:04:40 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 259

Pacer update 03 Oct 11 - SEC v Spongetech CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-02031-DLI -JMA ecf.nyed.uscourts.gov Date Filed # Docket Text 10/03/2011 183 REPLY in Support of Motion to Intervene and Stay Discovery filed by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B) (Reilly, Nathan) (Entered: 10/03/2011) Defendant Spongetech Delivery Systems, Inc. Defendant RM Enterprises International, Inc. Defendant Steven Moskowitz Defendant George Sperenza Defendant Joel Pensley Defendant Jack Halperin Defendant Michael Metter ecf.nyed.uscourts.gov