Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul V. who wrote (114203)	9/29/2011 2:58:20 PM
From: joefromspringfield	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

Even if they rule the mandate unconstitutional there is still the severability issue. I think the reason the Obama administration didn't want the entire appeals court to hear the case was the severability question. The three judge panel held it was severable. It is my understanding that most of the law would still be in effect even if the mandate was thrown out. Of course it would result in even bigger deficits. But I doubt that would bother either of you.