Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: X-Ray Man who wrote (4091)	11/19/1997 4:38:00 PM
From: John Donahoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

RE: "Few, and certainly not DOJ, are complaining about MSFT wanting to distribute the browser for free." X-Ray Man, I was responding to the issue of "dumping" not "bundling". See Post: techstocks.com JD

To: X-Ray Man who wrote (4091)	11/19/1997 4:59:00 PM
From: John Donahoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74651

RE: "Whether it is illegal or not is in dispute, and if you can make a clearcut answer without having read any of the DOJ complaint or previous agreement between DOJ and MSFT, I am quite impressed." If your question is whether or not MSFT violated the consent decree I can only obsereve that MFST's legal team says no and the DOJ's legal team says yes. We won't know until the court makes a judgement. I have a question: If the court rules that MSFT's OEM agreements didn't violate the consent decree does that mean the agreements are legal? JD