Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KVASIR who wrote (27617)	11/19/1997 2:05:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Respond to of 35569

Tanks, but no tanks

To: KVASIR who wrote (27617)	11/19/1997 3:42:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Battle of Kursk UBERALLE was one tank to one tank, one 'schmitt to one yak, one truck to one truck etc. UBERALLES the losses ver even. So how come the Duetsche loss already? Vell, de krautenhammers produced 900 panthers per month mkiv. T34's were beink cranked out at 12,000 per month. That is right twelve thousand. In factories that the Deutsche could not reach. And the Russkies far from mass attack tactics they are accused of always fought outnumbered 2 to one to the Deutsche army gruppe. The secret was they never abandoned a wave attack scenario but kept coming into losses. Their losses were no greater than the Deutsche. Their captured were higher however.