SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (114812)10/6/2011 10:53:32 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224750
 
Meet the real Grover Norquist

........................................................................................................................

October 05, 2011 by Joe Farah
wnd.com

This week a Republican member of Congress took on an increasingly controversial political activist, Americans for Tax Reform founder Grover Norquist, an influential figure in the conservative movement famous for his "no tax increase pledge."

Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., took to the House floor in an unusual and blistering denunciation of Norquist and his "unsavory" connections. Among those, he cited:

his ties to known terrorist financiers Abdurahman Alamoudi and Sami Al-Arian;

his support for the Ground Zero mosque;

his advocacy for transferring Guantanamo detainees to U.S. soil; his lobbying on behalf of Fannie Mae; his representation of the Internet gambling industry.

"Simply put," said Wolf in a sharp attack recorded on C-SPAN, "I believe Mr. Norquist is connected with or has profited from a number of unsavory people and groups out of the mainstream."

In response, Norquist pointed out Wolf is one of only six Republican members of the U.S. House who has refused to sign ATR's "Taxpayer Protection Pledge." He also said Wolf's allegations are "beneath him" and characterized the speech as a "hissy fit" and "a compilation of whack job criticisms."

So what's this all about? Many conservatives, I suspect, are left wondering, "Who's right – Wolf or Norquist?"

The answer: They are both partly right and partly wrong – but Wolf's attack is a great opportunity to shed some much-needed light on one of the most dangerous people in the conservative movement.

Wolf is mostly right about Norquist's very unconservative connections.

As the chief spokesman for Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said recently, Norquist has become the "chief cleric of Shariah tax law" in America.

Norquist has used his influence in Washington to propel the careers of people like Suhail Khan, a former Bush White House appointee, whose family founded the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. and held fundraisers for al-Qaida's No. 2 man, Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Thanks to Norquist's sponsorship, Khan now sits on the board of the American Conservative Union, the group that organizes the largest annual conservative conference in the country, known as CPAC. Norquist also serves on that board and the board of the National Rifle Association – as well as the advisory board of GOProud, a homosexual group promoting same-sex marriage, open homosexuality in the U.S. military and hate-crimes laws.

Indeed, Norquist claims to see no conflict between Islamic, Saudi-style Shariah law and the Constitution. In fact, he says Islam "is completely consistent with the U.S. Constitution and a free and open society." Anyone who disagrees with him, like me, an Arab-American whose grandparents fled the Middle East for the liberty they found in America, is "Islamophobic."

Norquist is also behind the Republican candidacy of Imam Afif "David" Ramadan in Virginia's 87th legislative district. Who is Ramadan? Ramadan is married to the daughter of a Shiite general in the Lebanese intelligence service, Ghanda Abdul Rahman Zoghbi. As Kenneth Timmerman, a veteran Middle East correspondent, writes, "How do you get to marry the daughter of a Shiite general in the Lebanese intelligence service, which has long been dominated by Iran's proxy, Hezbollah? Certainly not by being a secular Muslim – also known as an 'apostate' by Muslim believers – who embraces the supremacy of the U.S. Constitution over Shariah law?" Good question, indeed.

For more on Ramadan, be sure to see the brilliant profile by former CIA operations officer Kent Clizbe – hardly an Islamophobe given that he, like Norquist, married a Muslim woman.

But, getting back to the Norquist-Wolf feud, here's the irony: Both of them support the election of Ramadan!

That's what makes this issue of who's right and who's wrong so complicated.

Is Wolf a wimp on taxes? You bet!

Does Grover Norquist appear to be the gravitational center of an effort at Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the conservative movement and politics in America more generally? Yes, he does!

Grover Norquist suggests those concerned about the threat of Shariah law, Islamic terrorism and jihadist tyranny are all prone to exaggeration and anti-Muslim bigotry.

Grover Norquist, through his pimping for GOProud, is undermining a central tenet of conservatism – support for the traditional family, marriage and a moral system based on the Judeo-Christian values of the Bible.

But, because of Grover Norquist's influence, it gets even worse for the conservative movement, I'm afraid.

It is my considered opinion that Norquist is not even the "economic conservative" he is celebrated to be.

Even before the Republican House majority was seated after the 2010 election, Norquist began devising the strategy behind the total capitulation of the leadership on the raising of the debt limit. Here was a unique opportunity for a new brand of Republican leadership that could actually take a giant step toward limited government in Washington – by simply refusing to authorize more unsustainable borrowing. Norquist was the Machiavellian architect of this very unconservative capitulation.

While he may oppose tax increases, he has no problems with the federal government gorging itself at the trough of trillions in indebtedness.

In addition, Wolf is correct in pointing out that it was Norquist who led the opposition to Sen. Coburn's proposed elimination of the ethanol tax subsidy.

So what am I saying here?

I'm issuing a warning to anyone and everyone who considers himself or herself a "conservative" – whether you are in a leadership position or just a grass-roots activist.

Grover Norquist represents a grave danger to the conservative movement – and thus to the future of America. In my view, if America is to be saved from the gruesome fate of its current projector, the conservative movement will need to play a major corrective role. I simply don't see how that is possible when it is compromised, infiltrated and misdirected by people like Grover Norquist who are covertly promoting an agenda that is not only unconservative but, frankly, un-American.

Over many years, he has carefully constructed a power base for himself inside the movement through relationships, favors, money, introductions. His official resume looks strong. And few of those he has worked with over the years are prepared to defy him, question his funding, investigate his friendships or connect the dots of his many and varied and sometimes seemingly contradictory alliances.

Until grass-roots conservatives awaken from their slumber to discover who Grover Norquist is and whose interests he actually serves, the movement is in a lot of trouble.

And without a conservative movement focused like a laser beam on keeping America safe and secure, prosperous, free and morally upright, who is going to lead America in the right direction?






Read more: Meet the real Grover Norquist wnd.com




To: longnshort who wrote (114812)10/6/2011 3:57:31 PM
From: joseffy3 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224750
 
Gunwalker: Holder Got ‘At Least Five Weekly Memos’

Eric Holder faces damning evidence, while the White House and MSM rearrange the deck chairs

October 6, 2011 - - by Bob Owens
pajamasmedia.com

The thrusting and parrying between Obama administration officials, increasingly inquisitive journalists, and congressional investigators is evolving at a dizzying pace, as the Gunwalker conspiracy continues to unravel — to the horror of the executive branch. They have been reduced to screaming hysterics and Chip Dilleresque appeals to “ calm down” by one of the most dramatic scandals in American political history.

An attempt by the Obama administration — funneled through the Associated Press — to claim equivalence between a Bush-era cartel weapons interdiction program and the current administration’s plot to arm cartel members was debunked earlier today in a PJMedia exclusive. The Bush-era operation had no intention of allowing guns to walk, whereas Operation Fast and Furious and other alleged gunwalking programs were intentionally designed criminal enterprises.

Several congressmen and senators have voiced their concerns over the unfolding scandal in the past 24 hours. Senator Charles Grassley and House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa released a statement via Grassley’s office this morning, excoriating Attorney General Eric Holder’s apparent perjury in his sworn testimony in front of the Oversight Committee earlier this year.

The statement says in part:

Senator Chuck Grassley and Congressman Darrell Issa today said that Attorney General Eric Holder received at least five weekly memos beginning in July 2010, including four weeks in a row, describing the ill-advised strategy known as Operation Fast and Furious. The memos were to Holder from Michael Walther, the director of the National Drug Intelligence Center.

The Attorney General told Issa during a House Judiciary Committee in May 2011 that he had just learned of Fast and Furious a few weeks before. Yet, on January 31, in a previously scheduled meeting, Grassley personally handed him two letters about Fast and Furious. Grassley and Issa said they find it very troubling that Holder actually knew of Operation Fast and Furious much earlier, and in greater detail than he ever let on.

The memos specifically said that the straw buyers were “responsible for the purchase of 1500 firearms that were then supplied to Mexican drug trafficking cartels.”

“With the fairly detailed information that the Attorney General read, it seems the logical question for the Attorney General after reading in the memo would be ‘why haven’t we stopped them?’” Grassley said. “And if he didn’t ask the questions, why didn’t he or somebody in his office?”

The Daily Caller goes into more detail, noting:

Holder received briefing memos from National Drug Intelligence Center Director Michael Walther on July 5, July 12, July 19, July 26, and August 9.

The damning confirmation that Holder received weekly updates about the gunwalking operation which specifically informed him that 1,500 guns had been delivered to the Sinaloa cartel by that time, builds a stronger case that the attorney general committed perjury. Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar went even further in a statement yesterday, asserting that the Obama administration was guilty of far more:

Republican Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona told The Daily Caller on Wednesday that Obama administration officials responsible for Operation Fast and Furious might be accessories to murder.

“We’re talking about consequences of criminal activity, where we actually allowed guns to walk into the hands of criminals, where our livelihoods are at risk,” Gosar said in a phone interview. “When you facilitate that and a murder or a felony occurs, you’re called an accessory. That means that there’s criminal activity.”

Texas Senator John Cornyn was just as adamant in a series of interviews, revealing that Fast and Furious weapons are confirmed to have been recovered at 11 separate crime scenes within the United States so far. Cornyn bluntly accused Attorney General Holder of leading a Department of Justice cover-up, a charge which emerging evidence seems to support. Cornyn wants Holder back under oath testifying in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee:

“It’s looking more and more like the typical Washington scenario where people get caught doing bad things, but actually the cover-up ends up being worse than the original offense,” Cornyn, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said on a conference call with reporters.

Newspaper op-eds, such as this one from Investor’s Business Daily, are beginning to call for Eric Holder’s criminal indictment.

Amid the onslaught, the administration has offered nothing in the way of accountability and only a superficial offering of change by rearranging staff within the ATF. It seems that the administration, from the White House down through the Department of Justice into the ATF, thinks it can get away with little or no real consequences for a criminal conspiracy they orchestrated. They have been blamed for providing weapons that have killed 200 or more Mexican citizens, and that have been linked to the shootings of three federal law enforcement officers — two of whom were killed.

The New York Times, Washington Post, and Associated Press seem to be doing everything within their considerable power to minimize the crimes alleged against the administration, even as they overstate the rearranging of the deck chairs on Captain Obama’s sinking ship.

There may be ten or more gunwalking operations in five states, yet the part-time acting director of the ATF — who was also conspicuously the chairman of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee and allegedly briefed on Operation Fast and Furious, according to documents obtained by Senator Grassley — can’t seem to find them.

Perhaps being a “part-time acting director” is a do-nothing job in which he has no power, influence, or interest. Or perhaps he’s covering his own hide, much like the acting DOJ inspector general who leaked information to the alleged co-conspirators she is supposed to be investigating.

If there are ten or more gunwalking operations just half the size of Operation Fast and Furious, then 12,000 weapons were supplied to criminals by our federal government — enough to arm three U.S. Army infantry brigades. If each operation was roughly as large as Fast and Furious, we’re looking at more than 20,000 weapons — enough to equip a U.S. infantry division.

The possibilities suggest that the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, State Department, and White House committed felony crimes domestically and internationally on a nearly unimaginable scale.

The Obama administration is still defending Eric Holder:

White House press secretary Jay Carney said that Holder has been “consistent and truthful” about when he learned of the controversial tactics used in Operation Fast and Furious, which oversaw the sale of thousands of firearms to known and suspected straw buyers for Mexican drug cartels.

“The president believes he’s an excellent attorney general and has great confidence in him, and we absolutely know that the testimony he gave was consistent and truthful,” Carney told reporters at a press briefing.

What else can they say? An administration neck-deep in felony crimes isn’t going to turn on one of their co-conspirators without a solid exit plan.

Between possible charges of accessory to murder, violations of international terrorism laws, felony violations of arms export laws, and possible treason, Franklin’s advice to hang together to avoid hanging separately is far more literal than anyone would have ever dreamed just a week ago.