Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (28230)	10/9/2011 10:51:29 AM
From: SI Ron (Crazy Music Man)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32911

We have had a place to remember fallen members for some time now: Subject 55522

To: Metacomet who wrote (28230)	10/9/2011 11:09:09 AM
From: kidl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32911

I semi-agree with Meta. No point in a shame category. It carries a rather negative connotation and who needs more negativity these days? The number of posts per year is IMHO totally meaningless. The most followed people on SI don’t post all that much. Qualitative makes a lot more sense. Maybe based on recos? I like the idea of recognizing active members based on membership years. They may not be the best and the brightest but they have “survived” 10 or 15 years in the market. I have one other suggestion: Stop the ability to change aliases. I see no purpose in it. It just creates confusion.