Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (115157)	10/9/2011 7:04:33 PM
From: MJ	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224750

Obama and the Democrats will do everything possible to keep the birth records, the education records, his affiilation records and other records secret as well as the records of him and his czars and others closely connected who have overseen the last three years. What does Obama have to hide? What do the Democrats have to hide? As I recall, part of Obama's excuse for sequestering his records after the strolled down Pennsylvania Avenue and as he gave the Executive Order allowing no access to his records upon entering the White House----was for security reasons. When I read that in 2009, I immediately ask why in Obama's brief life would there be information that would require not revealing for security reasons? For example, what would a foreign government or terrorist want to know that would be a security problem. When ask about his Illinois State Senate Records early in his campaign against Hillary, Obama stated that he did not keep them. In other words, he threw them away or shredded them. Convenient, no state senate records kept by Obama himself. In other words, Obama kept no records that could leave a trail. Just rambling and posing a few questions mj