Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kidl who wrote (158388)	10/10/2011 9:43:22 AM
From: not_prudent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206085

I agree with you but what was the benefit of permitting cop's sale of its interest in Syncrude? That was more reserves than Daylight lays claim to.

To: kidl who wrote (158388)	10/10/2011 9:53:52 AM
From: Bwana Jim	Respond to of 206085

Do you think they would feel the same about COS? Or would the sale of COS to China be "too cozy"?? FWIW - In a clear case of superb timing, I sold all of my DAYYF a month ago. Dad Gummit!!!!

To: kidl who wrote (158388)	10/10/2011 10:09:11 AM
From: Salt'n'Peppa	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206085

The immediate "net benefit" to Canada is that it validates Alberta's oilpatch and opens the door to both globalization and foreign investment in our otherwise insular business. Would the idea of "net benefit to Canada" be any different if a large American company was doing this same deal instead of a Chinese one? You bet it would! IMO, the view of net benefit that you outline represents economic racism. S&P