SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (631156)10/10/2011 3:58:03 PM
From: TopCat  Respond to of 1583725
 
"It is true that one of Solyndra’s investors was a major contributor to the president’s 2008 campaign and the White House might have wanted to help him. And it is true that the wife of a key Energy Department official working on the case was a lawyer for Solyndra."

Just a coincidence.........right?



To: tejek who wrote (631156)10/10/2011 4:04:49 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583725
 
Ted, this is a job you can handle - they'll pay you to protest:

Political party paying Occupy Wall Street protesters?

Share416

posted at 10:05 am on October 10, 2011 by Ed Morrissey
printer-friendly
My friend Scott Johnson got a tip from a reader that the progressive New York political party Working Families has run an ad on Craigslist, one that apparently promises a salary for joining the OccupyWallStreet protests. Here’s a snapshot of the ad itself:



The headline strongly suggests that the position entails getting paid to protest, since the headline stresses that the job will hold “Wallstreet [sic] accountable now” and that the new hire will make a “differnence [sic]” and “get paid.” The body of the ad doesn’t specify what the duties of the position will be, although it does stress that it’s not going to be a job that involves complicated policy formation, or presumably proofreading:

You must be an energetic communicator, with a passion for social and economic justice. Only outgoing, articulate dedicated, determined candidates will be considered for the positions.

For those candidates that qualify WFP offers substantial paid-training provided by senior leadership, on varied issues such as: advocacy, public speaking, mobilizing, fundraising, networking and organizing. We invest in passionate people with excellent communication skills and a full benefits package is offered to those candidates that qualify. In addition, there is opportunity for advancement and travel to our satellite chapters and out of state affiliates.

This is not a policy job! Through direct action you will be shaping NY state politics for the next 20 years.

“Direct action” usually means protesting. In other words, WFP wants Astroturfers, presumably to join other Astroturfers who tire of their career at Wall Street in the coming days. I wonder how many of those currently at the #OWS protests are already drawing a salary from WFP?

By the way, for a political party that professes to be on the side of working families to oppose the greed on Wall Street, they sure don’t pay much for their ground troops:

Compensation: $350-$650 A Week Depending On Responsibility & Length Of Time On Staff

For full-time work, $350 works out to $8.75 an hour … in New York City. Not exactly a living wage, is it? It’s probably not quite as low as flipping burgers at Mickey D’s, but I’d guess that a Big Apple barista makes more to start, especially when counting tips. Always good to see that those protecting the masses from exploitation are sticking to the declared principles of labor relations that they decry. At least we know what the lowest-paid job on Wall Street is — and I’m guessing it’s not a union shop, either.

hotair.com



To: tejek who wrote (631156)10/10/2011 5:03:55 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1583725
 
>> In GOP's rush to judgment on Solyndra, solar energy takes a hit

If there was a rush to judgment it was on the part of the Obama administration, not the GOP.

The administration foolishly, idiotically even, approved a loan that had no chance of being repaid, which was bad enough.

But then, the law was broken when they subordinated the debt -- which turned it from a mere poor judgment to a situation where someone committed a crime.