Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proton who wrote (27687)	11/19/1997 5:16:00 PM
From: GOLDIGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Dear Peter, That letter was E-mailed to me by Ron Struthers. I suggest you ask him if it's genuine. I doesn't sound to promising if it is. GOLDIGER.

To: Proton who wrote (27687)	11/19/1997 5:21:00 PM
From: GOLDIGER	Respond to of 35569

Subject: RSA Update IPM from L Furlong Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 15:50:22 From: Ron Struthers <resource@sentex.net> To: resource@granite.sentex.net RSA Update IPM Nov 19 1997 Here is an email from Lee Furlong of IPM. I am just passing along as I got it. Hope it may answer some questions *****************************8 Phoenix office, 19 November 1997 Just some proof that it came from Struthers. GOLDIGER.

To: Proton who wrote (27687)	11/19/1997 5:56:00 PM
From: BobS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Peter, I've always enjoyed your posts (though I have to sometimes break out the thesaurus <g>). To your latest post (Re: Le Furlong letter) I reply: BINGO! It's my opinion that IPM has received conclusive evidence that several touted assay and recovery procedures do not work. The initial evidence assay and/or recovery results were released in PRs. But the ensuing failure of the process(es) was not released. From what I understand, that's a legal no-no. bobs.