Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (27688)	11/19/1997 5:13:00 PM
From: Proton	Respond to of 35569

Looks like we're back in sync, Richard. ;-) Pý

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (27688)	11/19/1997 6:35:00 PM
From: puzzlecraft	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Richard, > Unfortunately during the following 2 months we and other independent labs were unable to duplicate the assay methodology, thus it failed to live up to the 'due diligence' by IPM. The procedure was therefore abondoned and the purchase agreement with AuRIC cancelled. > Can anyone confirm that this from Le is factual? On the IPM website at ipmcf.com there is this: "Q8. IPM had announced an assay procedure was identified in June. What happened? Yes we did; however, the assay procedure announced in June did not withstand the rigors of third party review." So while I don't know if the part you quoted is from Le, it is clear the assay method announced failed DD, and without a corresponding un-announcment PR. Regards, John

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (27688)	11/20/1997 10:54:00 AM
From: ddl	Respond to of 35569

Richard, I can only confirm that as an RS subscriber, Ron assumes it to be a true letter from Lee and sent to us as such. But note, the leter is correspondence between "Frank" and "Lee". I think it was CL who sent it to Ron. Personally, I feel Lee should be booted from IPM. I feel he's the top spin doctor and I cannot have any more faith in anything IPM says until he is gone. Perhaps someone like Dr. Shaw should be given the unequivocal right to realease what he sees fit when he sees fit.- denis