SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (81637)10/18/2011 11:30:50 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217865
 
We agree there: <misses the mark when protesting on wall street as opposed to the capitol hill and the fed building. > But of course there's no need to go to the Fed, so you are wrong in part.

Mqurice



To: TobagoJack who wrote (81637)10/20/2011 5:53:06 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 217865
 
TJ, the problem is the system which failed ot close all loopholes by legislation including election contributions

In general I would agree with >>the wrong target of 1% is more clearly wrong in that unless the top 30% are wiped out, erased, downsized, or seriously adjusted, there would always be yet another 1% to be tee-up for reset. such 'moements' had never really ended well in the past.<<

At issue is for example one little fact - ALL the success of AAPL is granted to Steve Jobs, true he was a visionary just by pure luck of his genome makeup nothing else - Heaven gave this to him at birth. Does this mean that the production worker on the assembly line did not contribute to the company success?

Yes he was inspired by Steve Jobs to work harder and better - therefore even he should be compensated by this in granting him stock option in a proportionate way with ALL AAPL workers and ratios of amount of stock option should be defined in law as free markets do not work and board of directors are all "buddies" and corrupt

This I would call true capitalism - gather around those that have a vision improve society wellbeing with the products you produce work harder and earn more.

There should be a special income tax discount for those involved in producing “widgets” or designing products if hardware or medicine etc., in comparison to the “paper shuffler” who do not contribute to the wellbeing of society and do not produce any useful products, like WS, Banks, Insurance, Hedge Funds and LBO firms which should pay regular taxes and not only capital gain taxes.